TANvsLITETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. TAN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for LIT. TAN is up 18.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$426M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 33.84% YTD performance, and +$140M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
TAN vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN LIT | +9.19%+18.93% | +6.91%+22.27% | +18.03%+33.84% | +103.19%+137.98% | -18.04%+49.95% | -30.01%+42.11% |
| Flows | TAN LIT | +$65M+$103M | +$149M+$91M | +$426M+$140M | +$390M+$117M | +$100M-$1.23B | -$268M-$740M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN LIT | +32.00%+29.06% | +34.25%+26.39% | +34.58%+25.51% | +35.75%+26.10% |
| Max drawdown | TAN LIT | -11.92%-10.62% | -12.92%-10.62% | -64.11%-51.18% | -73.61%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN LIT | 71d41d | 72d41d | 1018d895d | 1641d1620d |
Trading data
TAN | LIT | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $59.21 | $88.75 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $58.41 | $88.24 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
TAN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
TAN | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $59.21 | $88.75 |
| 1D performance | +1.37% | +0.57% |
| AuM | $1.62 B | $2.13 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
TAN
USA
54.07%
Israel
14.77%
Cayman Islands
7.6%
Other
23.55%
LIT
USA
36.65%
China
33.92%
Republic of Korea
10.68%
Australia
8.81%
Other
9.94%
Sectors
TAN
Information Techn.
42.06%
Utilities
29.3%
Industrials
10%
Other
18.64%
LIT
Materials
32.31%
Industrials
18.91%
Information Techn.
12.01%
Consumer Discreti.
9.95%
Other
26.82%
Advertisement
Diversification
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
74.12%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
TAN
US65290E1010
10.18%
FIRST SOLAR
9.85%
ENPHASE ENERGY
6.55%
ENLIGHT RENEWABLE ENERGY
6.33%
SOLAREDGE TECH/D
5.79%
SUNRUN
4.92%
GCL TECHNOLOGY
4.31%
HNN ARMSTRNG S/D
4.15%
SOLARIA ENERGIA Y MEDIO AMBIENTE
3.96%
DORAL GROUP RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
3.48%
XINYI SOLAR HOLDINGS
3.30%
CLEARWAY ENERGY INC
3.23%
OY NOFAR ENERGY LTD
2.84%
ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES
2.64%
GRENERGY RENOVABLES
2.59%
LIT
US7672041008
20.40%
ALBEMARLE
7.37%
SAMSUNG SDI
4.73%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.25%
GANFENG LITHIUM
4.23%
US8336351056
4.07%
PILBARA MINERALS
3.96%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.78%
AMPEREX TECH
3.70%
BYD
3.17%
EVE ENERGY
2.91%
TIANQI LITHIUM
2.82%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.76%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.70%
TDK
2.61%
Frequently asked questions about TAN and LIT
How have the TAN and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 30, 2026, TAN is up 18.03% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 33.84%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or LIT?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$426M in flows, compared to +$140M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or LIT?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 34.25%, while LIT experienced 26.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or LIT?
As of April 30, 2026, TAN holds $1.62 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $2.13 B.
What sectors do the TAN and LIT ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and LIT ETF?
TAN top holdings include US65290E1010, FIRST SOLAR and ENPHASE ENERGY. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, ALBEMARLE and SAMSUNG SDI.
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or LIT?
TAN holds 31 securities with 74.12% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.46%.
Advertisement
Latest news about TAN & LIT
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Advertisement
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
LIT
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
June 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
