Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
TANvsICLNETF Comparison
Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. TAN's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, ICLN's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology. TAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.39% for ICLN. TAN is up 13.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$321M in YTD flows. ICLN performs worse with 12.83% YTD performance, and +$22M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of TAN and ICLN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
TAN vs ICLN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | TAN ICLN | -4.73%-2.54% | +12.66%+9.76% | +13.06%+12.83% | +70.41%+63.16% | -25.72%+0.84% | -42.56%-22.05% |
| Flows | TAN ICLN | -$65M+$47M | +$338M+$35M | +$321M+$22M | +$250M+$75M | -$87M-$1.82B | -$432M-$1.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | TAN ICLN | +31.54%+25.38% | +36.36%+23.12% | +34.69%+22.29% | +36.06%+25.68% |
| Max drawdown | TAN ICLN | -11.10%-8.79% | -21.51%-10.55% | -66.38%-44.77% | -73.61%-56.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | TAN ICLN | 21d14d | 56d77d | 1059d1016d | 1591d1591d |
TAN | ICLN | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.73 | $18.40 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $55.73 | $18.51 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
TAN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
TAN | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.73 | $18.40 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $1.45 B | $2.16 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the TAN and ICLN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, TAN is up 13.06% year-to-date (YTD), while ICLN has returned 12.83%. That puts TAN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: TAN or ICLN?
Year-to-date, the TAN ETF saw +$321M in flows, compared to +$22M for ICLN.
Which ETF is more volatile: TAN or ICLN?
Over the past year, TAN had a volatility of 36.36%, while ICLN experienced 23.12%.
Which ETF is bigger: TAN or ICLN?
As of March 11, 2026, TAN holds $1.45 B in assets under management (AUM), while ICLN manages $2.16 B.
What sectors do the TAN and ICLN ETFs invest in?
TAN leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, ICLN focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the TAN ETF and ICLN ETF?
TAN top holdings include US65290E1010, FIRST SOLAR and ENPHASE ENERGY. ICLN holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, US65290E1010 and FIRST SOLAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: TAN or ICLN?
TAN holds 29 securities with 74.41% of its assets in the top 15. ICLN has 101 securities and a top 15 weight of 60.94%.
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
ESG ETFs – Investing in sustainability
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
