Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SPHQvsACVFETF Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) is part of the US Large Cap segment. SPHQ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, ACVF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials. SPHQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.21%, versus 0.75% for ACVF. SPHQ is up 1.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$409M in YTD flows. ACVF performs worse with -0.19% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPHQ and ACVF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPHQ vs ACVF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPHQ ACVF | -4.33%-2.26% | +0.40%-1.04% | +1.25%-0.19% | +17.80%+17.20% | +77.18%+69.54% | +85.75%+73.39% |
| Flows | SPHQ ACVF | +$123M- | +$445M+$1M | +$409M- | +$2.39B+$2M | +$6.84B+$59M | +$8.71B+$93M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPHQ ACVF | +14.30%+12.06% | +17.12%+16.77% | +14.03%+14.28% | +16.36%+16.51% |
| Max drawdown | SPHQ ACVF | -6.17%-3.24% | -12.07%-12.32% | -16.54%-16.69% | -25.04%-24.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | SPHQ ACVF | 12d9d | 43d46d | 104d110d | 570d709d |
SPHQ | ACVF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.96 | $48.37 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $76.14 | $48.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SPHQ | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SPHQ | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.96 | $48.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.24% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $15.76 B | $136.72 M |
| E/R | 0.21% | 0.75% |
SPHQ | ACVF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Ridgeline Research |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Quality Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 349 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2005 | October 29, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SPHQ and ACVF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, SPHQ is up 1.25% year-to-date (YTD), while ACVF has lost -0.19%. That puts SPHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SPHQ or ACVF?
Year-to-date, the SPHQ ETF saw +$409M in flows, compared to - for ACVF.
Which ETF is more volatile: SPHQ or ACVF?
Over the past year, SPHQ had a volatility of 17.12%, while ACVF experienced 16.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: SPHQ or ACVF?
As of March 13, 2026, SPHQ holds $15.76 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACVF manages $136.72 M.
What sectors do the SPHQ and ACVF ETFs invest in?
SPHQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, ACVF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the SPHQ ETF and ACVF ETF?
SPHQ top holdings include VISA INCORPORATION, COSTCO WHOLESALE and MASTERCARD. ACVF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: SPHQ or ACVF?
SPHQ holds 100 securities with 52.97% of its assets in the top 15. ACVF has 361 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.03%.
There’s an ETF for That? America First
The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
