SPDvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Simplify US Equity PLUS Downside Convexity ETF (SPD) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SPD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.53%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. SPD is up 7.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$21M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$3.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SPD and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SPD vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SPD GPIQ | -0.09%-1.34% | +2.44%+5.41% | +7.20%+16.68% | +3.71%+16.08% | +70.10%+97.52% | +40.50%n/a |
| Flows | SPD GPIQ | +$1M+$553M | -$4M+$1.40B | -$21M+$3.70B | -$1M+$4.36B | -$24M+$6.11B | -$176M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SPD GPIQ | +14.15%+16.00% | +13.41%+17.30% | +17.22%+17.93% | +16.34%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SPD GPIQ | -4.79%-5.87% | -11.92%-9.57% | -14.87%-21.18% | -26.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SPD GPIQ | 75d21d | 185d75d | 98d124d | 897dn/a |
SPD | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 6:38 PM | $41.69 | $56.50 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $41.36 | $56.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SPD | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.69 | $56.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $102.01 M | $6.49 B |
| E/R | 0.53% | 0.35% |
SPD | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Simplify | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 3, 2020 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
