SMAYvsQYLDETF Comparison
ETF 1
SMAY
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May (SMAY) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. SMAY is up 5.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMAY and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMAY vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMAY QYLD | -1.91%+1.24% | -2.81%+4.86% | +5.78%+13.56% | +7.35%+20.25% | +36.70%+52.89% | n/a+49.30% |
| Flows | SMAY QYLD | +$1M+$42M | +$6M+$58M | +$13M-$166M | +$3M-$263M | +$63M+$85M | -+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMAY QYLD | +7.19%+9.78% | +7.04%+11.16% | +10.19%+13.51% | n/a+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | SMAY QYLD | -5.38%-3.58% | -5.38%-5.84% | -14.07%-19.06% | n/a-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | SMAY QYLD | 60d10d | 60d39d | 327d239d | n/a771d |
Trading data
SMAY | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.23 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $27.50 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SMAY
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexSMAY | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMAY | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.23 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $110.18 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
SMAY | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 19, 2023 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Diversification
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about SMAY and QYLD
How have the SMAY and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, SMAY is up 5.78% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMAY or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the SMAY ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMAY or QYLD?
Over the past year, SMAY had a volatility of 7.04%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMAY or QYLD?
As of October 15, 2026, SMAY holds $110.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about SMAY & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
