SMAYvsQQQIETF Comparison
ETF 1
SMAY
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
FT Vest U.S. Small Cap Moderate Buffer ETF - May (SMAY) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SMAY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. SMAY is up 5.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$13M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SMAY and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
SMAY vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SMAY QQQI | -1.91%+0.65% | -2.81%+1.01% | +5.78%+10.72% | +7.35%+14.06% | +36.70%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | SMAY QQQI | +$1M+$447M | +$6M+$2.14B | +$13M+$7.55B | +$3M+$9.46B | +$63M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SMAY QQQI | +7.19%+16.13% | +7.04%+16.85% | +10.19%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SMAY QQQI | -5.38%-6.64% | -5.38%-9.62% | -14.07%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SMAY QQQI | 60d13d | 60d76d | 327dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
SMAY | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.23 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $27.50 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
SMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.23 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.98% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $110.18 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
SMAY | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 19, 2023 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
SMAY
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about SMAY and QQQI
How have the SMAY and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, SMAY is up 5.78% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SMAY or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the SMAY ETF saw +$13M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: SMAY or QQQI?
Over the past year, SMAY had a volatility of 7.04%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: SMAY or QQQI?
As of October 15, 2026, SMAY holds $110.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about SMAY & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
Advertisement
