SIXOvsQQQIETF Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Apr/Oct ETF (SIXO) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SIXO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.74%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. SIXO is up 6.24% year-to-date (YTD) with -$302M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SIXO and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SIXO vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SIXO QQQI | +0.98%+0.65% | +2.28%+1.01% | +6.24%+10.72% | +8.81%+14.06% | +33.78%n/a | +44.84%n/a |
| Flows | SIXO QQQI | -$0K+$447M | -$6M+$2.14B | -$302M+$7.55B | -$30M+$9.46B | +$32M- | +$29M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SIXO QQQI | +2.24%+16.13% | +4.82%+16.85% | +7.63%n/a | +8.93%n/a |
| Max drawdown | SIXO QQQI | -0.41%-6.64% | -4.01%-9.62% | -12.02%n/a | -12.10%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SIXO QQQI | 14d13d | 63d76d | 149dn/a | 381dn/a |
SIXO | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $53.62 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $54.90 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SIXO | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | – | -2.33% |
| AuM | $119.78 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.74% | 0.68% |
SIXO | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Allianz Investment Management LLC | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2021 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
