Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SFLRvsGUSAETF Comparison
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US 1000 Equity ETF (GUSA) is part of the US Large Cap segment. SFLR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GUSA's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. SFLR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.89%, versus 0.11% for GUSA. SFLR is down -1.93% year-to-date (YTD) with +$194M in YTD flows. GUSA performs better with -0.7% YTD performance, and +$126K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SFLR and GUSA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SFLR vs GUSA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SFLR GUSA | -1.27%-2.36% | -1.59%-1.66% | -1.93%-0.70% | +15.74%+23.05% | +59.25%+81.82% | n/an/a |
| Flows | SFLR GUSA | +$84M- | +$221M+$2M | +$194M+$126K | +$645M+$2M | +$1.32B+$15M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SFLR GUSA | +9.32%+11.77% | +10.71%+18.42% | +9.95%+15.03% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | SFLR GUSA | -3.34%-3.42% | -7.44%-14.00% | -12.23%-19.25% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | SFLR GUSA | 59d43d | 49d45d | 139d126d | n/an/a |
SFLR | GUSA | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:42 PM | $36.03 | $57.68 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $36.07 | $58.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SFLR | GUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SFLR | GUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.03 | $57.68 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -1.55% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $2.12 B |
| E/R | 0.89% | 0.11% |
SFLR | GUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Innovator | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 170 | 911 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 9, 2022 | April 5, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SFLR and GUSA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SFLR is down -1.93% year-to-date (YTD), while GUSA has lost -0.7%. That puts GUSA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SFLR or GUSA?
Year-to-date, the SFLR ETF saw +$194M in flows, compared to +$126K for GUSA.
Which ETF is more volatile: SFLR or GUSA?
Over the past year, SFLR had a volatility of 10.71%, while GUSA experienced 18.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: SFLR or GUSA?
As of March 12, 2026, SFLR holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while GUSA manages $2.12 B.
What sectors do the SFLR and GUSA ETFs invest in?
SFLR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GUSA focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SFLR ETF and GUSA ETF?
SFLR top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. GUSA holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SFLR or GUSA?
SFLR holds 186 securities with 45.67% of its assets in the top 15. GUSA has 1001 securities and a top 15 weight of 39.9%.
How Innovator's "Managed Floor" ETFs Can Fit Into a 40/30/30 Portfolio
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
