SEPZvsDIVOETF Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF - USD
TrueShares Structured Outcome (September) ETF - USD (SEPZ) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. SEPZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. SEPZ is up 9.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SEPZ and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SEPZ vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SEPZ DIVO | +1.06%+2.03% | +1.25%+3.64% | +9.31%+11.40% | +12.42%+16.33% | +56.34%+60.32% | +63.56%+70.24% |
| Flows | SEPZ DIVO | -+$113M | -$538K+$375M | +$9M+$1.73B | +$6M+$2.24B | +$83M+$3.73B | +$76M+$5.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SEPZ DIVO | +9.49%+8.36% | +10.46%+9.37% | +11.52%+10.63% | +12.36%+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | SEPZ DIVO | -2.91%-4.23% | -7.12%-5.92% | -14.35%-12.14% | -15.18%-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | SEPZ DIVO | 64d43d | 92d114d | 127d130d | 532d329d |
SEPZ | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.13 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.53 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
SEPZ | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.13 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.86% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $129.45 M | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.56% |
SEPZ | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | TrueShares | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 31, 2020 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
