Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCZvsAVDVETF Comparison
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) belong to the same industry segment: DM Small Cap. SCZ's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Materials. In contrast, AVDV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials and Financials. SCZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.36% for AVDV. SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD) with +$533M in YTD flows. AVDV performs better with 9.61% YTD performance, and +$1.13B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCZ and AVDV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCZ vs AVDV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCZ AVDV | -7.06%-4.61% | +3.31%+11.48% | +1.40%+9.61% | +26.60%+54.80% | +49.88%+101.10% | +26.74%+93.87% |
| Flows | SCZ AVDV | +$272M+$529M | +$745M+$1.37B | +$533M+$1.13B | +$2.53B+$5.68B | -$662M+$9.41B | +$94M+$11.67B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCZ AVDV | +14.30%+16.29% | +14.88%+16.48% | +14.01%+15.03% | +15.98%+17.19% |
| Max drawdown | SCZ AVDV | -8.54%-6.93% | -13.31%-14.01% | -14.86%-14.01% | -36.93%-28.06% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCZ AVDV | 11d10d | 37d37d | 154d37d | 1362d841d |
SCZ | AVDV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:42 PM | $78.01 | $98.96 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $79.01 | $100.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCZ | AVDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCZ | AVDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $78.01 | $98.96 |
| 1D performance | -1.27% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $13.36 B | $17.78 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.36% |
SCZ | AVDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1858 | 1516 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 10, 2007 | September 24, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCZ and AVDV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ is up 1.4% year-to-date (YTD), while AVDV has returned 9.61%. That puts AVDV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCZ or AVDV?
Year-to-date, the SCZ ETF saw +$533M in flows, compared to +$1.13B for AVDV.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCZ or AVDV?
Over the past year, SCZ had a volatility of 14.88%, while AVDV experienced 16.48%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCZ or AVDV?
As of March 12, 2026, SCZ holds $13.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while AVDV manages $17.78 B.
What sectors do the SCZ and AVDV ETFs invest in?
SCZ leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Materials. Meanwhile, AVDV focuses on Industrials, Materials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the SCZ ETF and AVDV ETF?
SCZ top holdings include TOWER SEMICONDUCTOR, BAWAG GROUP AG and IBIDEN. AVDV holds in its top three: MITSUI MINING AND SMELTING, CA6752224007 and PERSEUS MINING ORDINARY.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCZ or AVDV?
SCZ holds 1996 securities with 4.38% of its assets in the top 15. AVDV has 1620 securities and a top 15 weight of 10.39%.
Avantis Plans to Launch New Suite of Value Factor ETFs
Investing in international small-cap value ETFs
Investing in international ETFs: A primer
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
