Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
SCHGvsIWFETF Comparison
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. SCHG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. SCHG is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.04%, versus 0.18% for IWF. SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD) with +$808M in YTD flows. IWF performs better with -4.6% YTD performance, and -$3.40B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of SCHG and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
SCHG vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | SCHG IWF | -1.07%-1.42% | -6.73%-5.65% | -5.54%-4.60% | +23.18%+24.77% | +109.76%+103.62% | +93.87%+92.00% |
| Flows | SCHG IWF | +$197M+$648M | +$1.25B-$2.01B | +$808M-$3.40B | +$7.39B-$1.57B | +$16.59B-$469M | +$19.73B-$1.22B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | SCHG IWF | +15.30%+15.76% | +23.06%+22.60% | +19.55%+19.04% | +22.46%+21.41% |
| Max drawdown | SCHG IWF | -8.06%-7.14% | -15.72%-15.75% | -23.41%-23.36% | -34.60%-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | SCHG IWF | 76d76d | 45d45d | 193d191d | 754d743d |
SCHG | IWF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.25 | $443.29 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $30.80 | $451.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
SCHG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
SCHG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.25 | $443.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -1.78% |
| AuM | $50.74 B | $116.99 B |
| E/R | 0.04% | 0.18% |
SCHG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Schwab ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 169 | 349 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2009 | May 22, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the SCHG and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG is down -5.54% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -4.6%. That puts IWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: SCHG or IWF?
Year-to-date, the SCHG ETF saw +$808M in flows, compared to -$3.40B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: SCHG or IWF?
Over the past year, SCHG had a volatility of 23.06%, while IWF experienced 22.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: SCHG or IWF?
As of March 11, 2026, SCHG holds $50.74 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $116.99 B.
What sectors do the SCHG and IWF ETFs invest in?
SCHG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the SCHG ETF and IWF ETF?
SCHG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: SCHG or IWF?
SCHG holds 189 securities with 67.64% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.22%.
ETF Comparison: Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Versus Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV)
Top 3 growth ETFs of 2022
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
