Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLDvsIWMWETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. RYLD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. In contrast, IWMW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Health Care. RYLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.39% for IWMW. RYLD is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. IWMW performs worse with -0.85% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLD and IWMW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLD vs IWMW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLD IWMW | -2.16%-2.68% | +0.70%-0.98% | +0.11%-0.85% | +11.75%+13.46% | +21.26%n/a | +10.48%n/a |
| Flows | RYLD IWMW | -$8M+$4M | +$30M+$17M | +$10M+$13M | -$105M+$27M | +$156M- | +$1.86B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLD IWMW | +12.44%+13.57% | +16.80%+17.61% | +13.42%n/a | +14.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RYLD IWMW | -4.86%-5.49% | -13.36%-14.60% | -18.87%n/a | -21.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLD IWMW | 14d14d | 104d98d | 243dn/a | 1509dn/a |
RYLD | IWMW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.00 | $36.94 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $15.04 | $37.07 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLD | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLD | IWMW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.00 | $36.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $1.26 B | $45.89 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLD and IWMW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, RYLD is up 0.11% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMW has lost -0.85%. That puts RYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLD or IWMW?
Year-to-date, the RYLD ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$13M for IWMW.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLD or IWMW?
Over the past year, RYLD had a volatility of 16.8%, while IWMW experienced 17.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLD or IWMW?
As of March 12, 2026, RYLD holds $1.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWMW manages $45.89 M.
What sectors do the RYLD and IWMW ETFs invest in?
RYLD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWMW focuses on Industrials, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the RYLD ETF and IWMW ETF?
RYLD top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWMW holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLD or IWMW?
RYLD holds 1887 securities with 7.85% of its assets in the top 15. IWMW has 1942 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.07%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Rohan Reddy with Global X
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
