Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RYLDvsIWMIETF Comparison
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Health Care and Financials. RYLD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.78% for IWMI. RYLD is down -0.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. IWMI performs better with -0.04% YTD performance, and +$220M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RYLD and IWMI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RYLD vs IWMI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RYLD IWMI | -3.43%-4.94% | +0.41%-1.16% | -0.16%-0.04% | +13.31%+25.31% | +20.93%n/a | +10.13%n/a |
| Flows | RYLD IWMI | +$197K+$55M | +$29M+$265M | +$10M+$220M | -$107M+$497M | +$156M- | +$1.86B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RYLD IWMI | +12.45%+14.01% | +16.71%+19.03% | +13.41%n/a | +14.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown | RYLD IWMI | -5.12%-6.14% | -13.36%-15.22% | -18.87%n/a | -21.96%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | RYLD IWMI | 15d15d | 104d52d | 243dn/a | 1509dn/a |
RYLD | IWMI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $15.00 | $47.49 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $15.04 | $47.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RYLD | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RYLD | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $15.00 | $47.49 |
| 1D performance | -0.27% | -0.40% |
| AuM | $1.26 B | $649.85 M |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.78% |
RYLD | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1631 | 1636 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 17, 2019 | June 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RYLD and IWMI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, RYLD is down -0.16% year-to-date (YTD), while IWMI has lost -0.04%. That puts IWMI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RYLD or IWMI?
Year-to-date, the RYLD ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to +$220M for IWMI.
Which ETF is more volatile: RYLD or IWMI?
Over the past year, RYLD had a volatility of 16.71%, while IWMI experienced 19.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: RYLD or IWMI?
As of March 13, 2026, RYLD holds $1.26 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWMI manages $649.85 M.
What sectors do the RYLD and IWMI ETFs invest in?
RYLD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, IWMI focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RYLD ETF and IWMI ETF?
RYLD top holdings include BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLS. IWMI holds in its top three: BLOOM ENERGY CORP, CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDING and FABRINET.
Which ETF is more diversified: RYLD or IWMI?
RYLD holds 1887 securities with 7.85% of its assets in the top 15. IWMI has 1958 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.56%.
Three Ways You Can Get Higher Income with ETFs
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
Rohan Reddy with Global X
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.