Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RTHvsXLYETF Comparison
The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
VanEck Retail ETF (RTH) and The Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. RTH's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Health Care. In contrast, XLY's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, RTH is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.08% for XLY. RTH is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. XLY performs worse with -6.58% YTD performance, and -$844M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RTH and XLY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RTH vs XLY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RTH XLY | -1.50%-3.98% | +1.70%-7.40% | +3.50%-6.58% | +16.91%+13.86% | +72.40%+65.17% | +71.25%+39.29% |
| Flows | RTH XLY | +$1K+$476M | +$5M-$478M | +$5M-$844M | -$5M-$946M | +$19M+$380M | -$25M-$2.08B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RTH XLY | +11.07%+16.27% | +14.99%+23.73% | +13.46%+20.61% | +16.71%+23.65% |
| Max drawdown | RTH XLY | -3.11%-10.44% | -9.15%-14.39% | -13.84%-26.02% | -24.97%-39.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | RTH XLY | 36d59d | 29d45d | 182d268d | 804d1080d |
RTH | XLY | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $255.11 | $110.86 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $256.20 | $111.52 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RTH | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RTH | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $255.11 | $110.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.42% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $261.12 M | $21.98 B |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.08% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RTH and XLY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RTH is up 3.5% year-to-date (YTD), while XLY has lost -6.58%. That puts RTH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RTH or XLY?
Year-to-date, the RTH ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to -$844M for XLY.
Which ETF is more volatile: RTH or XLY?
Over the past year, RTH had a volatility of 14.99%, while XLY experienced 23.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: RTH or XLY?
As of March 11, 2026, RTH holds $261.12 M in assets under management (AUM), while XLY manages $21.98 B.
What sectors do the RTH and XLY ETFs invest in?
RTH leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Health Care. Meanwhile, XLY focuses on Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the RTH ETF and XLY ETF?
RTH top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, WALMART INC and COSTCO WHOLESALE. XLY holds in its top three: AMAZON.COM INC, TESLA and HOME DEPOT.
Which ETF is more diversified: RTH or XLY?
RTH holds 25 securities with 85.39% of its assets in the top 15. XLY has 48 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.77%.
There's an ETF for That? Black Friday & Cyber Monday Retail
Consumer Discretionary Sector Hit by Tesla Stock's Plummet
Consumer Discretionary Funds Weighed Down by Tesla Stocks
2024 Stock Market Predictions from Vanguard, BlackRock, & State Street: ETFs to Watch
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
