Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RPVvsCDCETF Comparison
VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Invesco S&P 500® Pure Value ETF (RPV) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF (CDC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. RPV's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Financials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, CDC's top sector exposures are Utilities, Consumer Staples and Financials. RPV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.38% for CDC. RPV is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD) with +$142M in YTD flows. CDC performs better with 8.8% YTD performance, and -$32M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RPV and CDC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RPV vs CDC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RPV CDC | -4.30%-1.22% | +3.64%+8.66% | +4.05%+8.80% | +20.58%+14.17% | +52.68%+34.64% | +60.49%+39.55% |
| Flows | RPV CDC | -$16M-$15M | +$197M-$38M | +$142M-$32M | +$142M-$122M | -$2.17B-$1.27B | -$405M+$42M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RPV CDC | +13.74%+9.40% | +17.26%+13.79% | +16.24%+11.35% | +18.03%+12.67% |
| Max drawdown | RPV CDC | -5.10%-3.17% | -12.12%-11.16% | -15.48%-12.62% | -22.67%-21.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | RPV CDC | 20d8d | 79d90d | 134d254d | 412d947d |
RPV | CDC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $107.73 | $71.10 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $107.53 | $71.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RPV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RPV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $107.73 | $71.10 |
| 1D performance | +0.19% | -0.31% |
| AuM | $1.69 B | $724.11 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.38% |
RPV | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 Pure Value Index | Nasdaq Victory US Large Cap High Dividend 100 Long/Cash Volatility Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 118 | 98 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 1, 2006 | July 1, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RPV and CDC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, RPV is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD), while CDC has returned 8.8%. That puts CDC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RPV or CDC?
Year-to-date, the RPV ETF saw +$142M in flows, compared to -$32M for CDC.
Which ETF is more volatile: RPV or CDC?
Over the past year, RPV had a volatility of 17.26%, while CDC experienced 13.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: RPV or CDC?
As of March 10, 2026, RPV holds $1.69 B in assets under management (AUM), while CDC manages $724.11 M.
What sectors do the RPV and CDC ETFs invest in?
RPV leans toward sectors like Health Care, Financials and Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, CDC focuses on Utilities, Consumer Staples and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the RPV ETF and CDC ETF?
RPV top holdings include CH1300646267, THE MOSAIC COMPANY and MOLINA HLTHCRE. CDC holds in its top three: EVERGY, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and COCA-COLA.
Which ETF is more diversified: RPV or CDC?
RPV holds 122 securities with 27.83% of its assets in the top 15. CDC has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.36%.
Top 3 value ETFs of 2022
How to become a value investor using ETFs
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.