Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ROKTvsGCADETF Comparison
Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF
SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) belongs to the Space & Deep Sea segment. Gabelli Commercial Aerospace & Defense ETF (GCAD) is part of the segment. ROKT's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Energy. In contrast, GCAD's top sector exposures are Industrials, Materials ROKT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.9% for GCAD. ROKT is up 21.04% year-to-date (YTD) with +$28M in YTD flows. GCAD performs worse with 16.93% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ROKT and GCAD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ROKT vs GCAD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ROKT GCAD | +2.17%+1.50% | +25.90%+21.35% | +21.04%+16.93% | +97.34%+65.09% | +159.00%+126.08% | +166.84%n/a |
| Flows | ROKT GCAD | +$5M+$2M | +$32M+$10M | +$28M+$10M | +$38M+$14M | +$34M+$17M | +$29M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ROKT GCAD | +34.35%+20.30% | +27.84%+20.47% | +21.98%+17.72% | +21.55%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ROKT GCAD | -8.62%-3.92% | -15.08%-13.68% | -23.27%-16.22% | -23.28%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ROKT GCAD | 22d7d | 43d37d | 150d91d | 718dn/a |
ROKT | GCAD | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.67 | $53.38 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $103.02 | $53.83 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ROKT | GCAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ROKT | GCAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.67 | $53.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.34% | -0.84% |
| AuM | $78.20 M | $27.64 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.9% |
ROKT | GCAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | SPDR | Gabelli Funds |
| Benchmark | S&P Kensho Final Frontiers Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 32 | 37 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 22, 2018 | January 3, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ROKT and GCAD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ROKT is up 21.04% year-to-date (YTD), while GCAD has returned 16.93%. That puts ROKT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ROKT or GCAD?
Year-to-date, the ROKT ETF saw +$28M in flows, compared to +$10M for GCAD.
Which ETF is more volatile: ROKT or GCAD?
Over the past year, ROKT had a volatility of 27.84%, while GCAD experienced 20.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: ROKT or GCAD?
As of March 10, 2026, ROKT holds $78.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while GCAD manages $27.64 M.
What sectors do the ROKT and GCAD ETFs invest in?
ROKT leans toward sectors like Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, GCAD focuses on Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ROKT ETF and GCAD ETF?
ROKT top holdings include PLANET LABS PBC, US46125A1007 and REDWIRE CORPORATION. GCAD holds in its top three: BOEING U, LOCKHEED MARTIN and NORTHROP GRUMMAN.
Which ETF is more diversified: ROKT or GCAD?
ROKT holds 35 securities with 55.38% of its assets in the top 15. GCAD has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 62.4%.
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Space
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Aerospace & Defense ETFs
Israel-Hamas War, Part 1: Implications for Aerospace & Defense ETFs
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
