RODMvsEFAETF Comparison
ETF 1
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.06%
VS
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. RODM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, EFA's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. RODM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.29%, versus 0.32% for EFA. RODM is up 15.21% year-to-date (YTD) with +$163M in YTD flows. EFA performs worse with 13.24% YTD performance, and +$482M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RODM and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RODM vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RODM EFA | +0.88%+0.77% | +3.86%+3.40% | +15.21%+13.24% | +23.65%+22.27% | +79.70%+65.71% | +60.91%+53.21% |
| Flows | RODM EFA | +$6M- | +$69M+$128M | +$163M+$482M | +$181M+$1.73B | -$477M+$5.28B | -$647M+$2.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RODM EFA | +7.01%+15.04% | +8.91%+15.67% | +10.81%+15.03% | +12.30%+16.33% |
| Max drawdown | RODM EFA | -2.15%-3.44% | -7.11%-11.39% | -10.21%-13.68% | -28.60%-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | RODM EFA | 28d10d | 65d107d | 34d41d | 981d892d |
Trading data
RODM | EFA | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 7:59 PM | $42.14 | $107.66 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $41.87 | $107.06 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RODM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
RODM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.14 | $107.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +0.56% |
| AuM | $1.65 B | $78.99 B |
| E/R | 0.29% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
RODM | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Hartford Funds | iShares |
| Benchmark | Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 336 | 663 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 25, 2015 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RODM
Japan
19.59%
Canada
18.25%
Australia
8.91%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Other
45.38%
EFA
Japan
22.87%
United Kingdom
13.97%
Switzerland
10.07%
France
8.88%
Germany
8.81%
Other
35.39%
Sectors
RODM
Finance
31.42%
Industrials
12.86%
Healthcare
10.25%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.72%
Technology
7.56%
Other
29.19%
EFA
Finance
28.15%
Industrials
15.83%
Technology
12.01%
Healthcare
10%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.32%
Other
25.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
RODM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.56%
EFA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.34%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RODM
Equinor ASA
1.25%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.19%
Bank of Montreal
1.16%
ASML Holding NV
1.15%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.11%
Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. Ltd.
1.08%
BOC Hong Kong (Holdings) Ltd.
1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA
1.01%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
1.00%
A.P. Møller-Mærsk A/S
0.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
0.96%
Roche Holding AG
0.94%
Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.
0.90%
Novartis AG
0.88%
Woolworths Group Ltd.
0.86%
EFA
ASML Holding NV
2.92%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.67%
Roche Holding AG
1.40%
Novartis AG
1.31%
Nestlé SA
1.19%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.17%
Shell Plc
1.14%
Siemens AG
1.09%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.96%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
0.95%
Banco Santander SA
0.92%
Allianz SE
0.86%
SAP SE
0.85%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.84%
Frequently asked questions about RODM and EFA
How have the RODM and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, RODM is up 15.21% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 13.24%. That puts RODM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RODM or EFA?
Year-to-date, the RODM ETF saw +$163M in flows, compared to +$482M for EFA.
Which ETF is more volatile: RODM or EFA?
Over the past year, RODM had a volatility of 8.91%, while EFA experienced 15.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: RODM or EFA?
As of September 2, 2026, RODM holds $1.65 B in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $78.99 B.
What sectors do the RODM and EFA ETFs invest in?
RODM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the RODM ETF and EFA ETF?
RODM top holdings include Equinor ASA, Royal Bank of Canada and Bank of Montreal. EFA holds in its top three: ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: RODM or EFA?
RODM holds 336 securities with 15.56% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 674 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.34%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RODM & EFA
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
January 14, 2026
EFA
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
December 23, 2025
EFA
Advertisement
Advertisement
