RCTRvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. RCTR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for URNM. RCTR is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$16M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with 3.64% YTD performance, and +$453M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
RCTR vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR URNM | +0.86%+17.11% | -4.51%-6.99% | +3.69%+3.64% | +12.37%+14.50% | n/a+63.44% | n/a+115.10% |
| Flows | RCTR URNM | +$3M+$136M | +$9M+$154M | +$16M+$453M | +$28M+$423M | -+$629M | -+$1.33B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR URNM | +23.83%+46.06% | +24.27%+43.60% | n/a+37.19% | n/a+40.86% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR URNM | -11.88%-26.21% | -18.92%-42.35% | n/a-50.18% | n/a-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR URNM | 91d90d | 118d215d | n/a485d | n/a485d |
Trading data
RCTR | URNM | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.57 | $54.95 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $33.41 | $54.67 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.57 | $54.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | +0.51% |
| AuM | $30.16 M | $2.20 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 43 | 25 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
RCTR
USA
44.46%
Japan
14.78%
Canada
7.9%
Other
32.86%
URNM
Canada
57.74%
Australia
15.55%
USA
12.92%
Other
13.79%
Sectors
RCTR
Utilities
40.87%
Industrials
39.07%
Energy
10.49%
Other
9.57%
URNM
Energy
74.83%
Non-Corporate
14.5%
Industrials
8.62%
Other
2.04%
Advertisement
Diversification
RCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.54%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
92.27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
RCTR
Hitachi Ltd.
5.20%
Constellation Energy Corp.
5.17%
BHP Group Ltd.
5.05%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
4.88%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
4.56%
Cameco Corp.
4.40%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
4.34%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.29%
Entergy Corp.
4.23%
The Southern Co.
4.23%
Vistra Corp.
4.17%
Talen Energy Corp.
3.94%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.93%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.71%
CEZ as
3.44%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
19.40%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
14.50%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.73%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.06%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.82%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.62%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.54%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.32%
Yellow Cake Plc
4.30%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.14%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.14%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.78%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.57%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.24%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.11%
Frequently asked questions about RCTR and URNM
How have the RCTR and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, RCTR is up 3.69% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 3.64%. That puts RCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or URNM?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$16M in flows, compared to +$453M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: RCTR or URNM?
Over the past year, RCTR had a volatility of 24.27%, while URNM experienced 43.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or URNM?
As of September 1, 2026, RCTR holds $30.16 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.20 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and URNM ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Utilities, Industrials and Energy. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and URNM ETF?
RCTR top holdings include Hitachi Ltd., Constellation Energy Corp. and BHP Group Ltd.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or URNM?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 65.54% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 92.27%.
Advertisement
Latest news about RCTR & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNM
Sprott’s Uranium Pure Play
November 7, 2023
URNM
Advertisement
