Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
RCTRvsURNMETF Comparison
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. RCTR's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Energy. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. RCTR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.7%, versus 0.75% for URNM. RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. URNM performs better with 24.51% YTD performance, and +$211M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of RCTR and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
RCTR vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | RCTR URNM | -0.94%-3.86% | +8.11%+21.28% | +12.15%+24.51% | n/a+117.20% | n/a+145.38% | n/a+203.77% |
| Flows | RCTR URNM | -+$60M | +$5M+$258M | +$5M+$211M | --$14M | -+$423M | -+$1.27B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | RCTR URNM | +25.45%+49.64% | n/a+41.62% | n/a+34.80% | n/a+40.82% |
| Max drawdown | RCTR URNM | -7.92%-21.26% | n/a-23.61% | n/a-50.18% | n/a-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | RCTR URNM | 22d41d | n/a86d | n/a485d | n/a485d |
RCTR | URNM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.12 | $67.17 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.50 | $67.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.12 | $67.17 |
| 1D performance | -1.05% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $21.81 M | $2.38 B |
| E/R | 0.7% | 0.75% |
RCTR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 17 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 30, 2025 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the RCTR and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR is up 12.15% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 24.51%. That puts URNM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: RCTR or URNM?
Year-to-date, the RCTR ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$211M for URNM.
Which ETF is bigger: RCTR or URNM?
As of March 11, 2026, RCTR holds $21.81 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.38 B.
What sectors do the RCTR and URNM ETFs invest in?
RCTR leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Energy. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the RCTR ETF and URNM ETF?
RCTR top holdings include CAMECO, DOOSAN ENERBILITY and MITSUBISHI HVY. URNM holds in its top three: CAMECO, URANIUM ENERGY and DEEP YELLOW.
Which ETF is more diversified: RCTR or URNM?
RCTR holds 43 securities with 64.25% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 18 securities and a top 15 weight of 80.69%.
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
Sprott’s Uranium Pure Play
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
