QMARvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. QMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. QMAR is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$78M in YTD flows. QYLD performs worse with 14.29% YTD performance, and -$156M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMAR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMAR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/19/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMAR QYLD | -0.28%-0.18% | +3.95%+6.64% | +16.02%+14.29% | +18.24%+19.38% | +58.45%+59.08% | +71.60%+49.92% |
| Flows | QMAR QYLD | +$15M+$20M | +$32M+$62M | +$78M-$156M | +$93M-$245M | +$226M+$100M | +$388M+$4.83B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMAR QYLD | +6.23%+9.53% | +6.94%+11.14% | +10.86%+13.48% | +13.99%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | QMAR QYLD | -2.28%-3.58% | -3.27%-5.84% | -15.76%-19.06% | -19.79%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | QMAR QYLD | 10d10d | 10d39d | 128d239d | 416d771d |
Trading data
QMAR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 7:59 PM | $38.29 | $18.33 |
| Previous close 10/20/2026 | $38.32 | $18.28 |
| Consolidated volume 10/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QMAR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/20/2026 at 7:59 PM
Live
Closed
QMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.29 | $18.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $616.39 M | $8.36 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
QMAR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | First Trust | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
QMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QMAR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QMAR and QYLD
How have the QMAR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 19, 2026, QMAR is up 16.02% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.29%. That puts QMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMAR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the QMAR ETF saw +$78M in flows, compared to -$156M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMAR or QYLD?
Over the past year, QMAR had a volatility of 6.94%, while QYLD experienced 11.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMAR or QYLD?
As of October 19, 2026, QMAR holds $616.39 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.36 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about QMAR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
