QMARvsHELOETF Comparison
VS
FT Vest Growth-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. QMAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.9%, versus 0.5% for HELO. QMAR is up 15.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$73M in YTD flows. HELO performs worse with 4.99% YTD performance, and +$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QMAR and HELO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QMAR vs HELO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QMAR HELO | +0.89%-0.36% | +3.06%+2.74% | +15.53%+4.99% | +18.79%+7.01% | +55.80%+41.51% | +71.34%n/a |
| Flows | QMAR HELO | +$10M+$56M | +$26M+$262M | +$73M+$1.07B | +$81M+$1.13B | +$220M+$4.25B | +$382M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QMAR HELO | +6.26%+7.21% | +6.94%+7.02% | +10.85%+7.83% | +13.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QMAR HELO | -2.28%-2.37% | -3.27%-5.83% | -15.76%-10.86% | -19.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QMAR HELO | 10d64d | 10d73d | 128d169d | 416dn/a |
Trading data
QMAR | HELO | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $38.32 | $69.44 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $38.09 | $69.21 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QMAR | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $38.32 | $69.44 |
| 1D performance | +0.60% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $608.08 M | $4.88 B |
| E/R | 0.9% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
QMAR | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | First Trust | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 22, 2020 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QMAR
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
QMAR
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
QMAR
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
QMAR
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about QMAR and HELO
How have the QMAR and HELO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, QMAR is up 15.53% year-to-date (YTD), while HELO has returned 4.99%. That puts QMAR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QMAR or HELO?
Year-to-date, the QMAR ETF saw +$73M in flows, compared to +$1.07B for HELO.
Which ETF is more volatile: QMAR or HELO?
Over the past year, QMAR had a volatility of 6.94%, while HELO experienced 7.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: QMAR or HELO?
As of October 16, 2026, QMAR holds $608.08 M in assets under management (AUM), while HELO manages $4.88 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about QMAR & HELO
Hedged Equity ETFs: Options-Based Alternatives to the 60/40 Portfolio
March 25, 2025
HELO
Advertisement
Advertisement
