Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
QLVDvsDBEFETF Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund ETF (QLVD) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. QLVD's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, DBEF's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. QLVD is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.14%, versus 0.35% for DBEF. QLVD is up 4.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$66K in YTD flows. DBEF performs worse with 3.61% YTD performance, and -$63M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLVD and DBEF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
QLVD vs DBEF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLVD DBEF | -2.11%-2.75% | +7.13%+5.53% | +4.81%+3.61% | +18.47%+21.29% | +48.71%+62.20% | +47.48%+86.74% |
| Flows | QLVD DBEF | +$66K-$52M | +$66K-$298M | +$66K-$63M | +$10M-$377M | -$32M+$2.19B | -$36M+$2.45B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLVD DBEF | +9.50%+11.63% | +11.74%+13.78% | +10.07%+11.49% | +11.03%+11.76% |
| Max drawdown | QLVD DBEF | -5.36%-6.85% | -8.72%-14.30% | -9.60%-14.53% | -24.25%-14.56% |
| Max drawdown duration | QLVD DBEF | 9d9d | 12d56d | 157d73d | 980d385d |
QLVD | DBEF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:37 PM | $33.13 | $49.32 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.31 | $49.91 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
QLVD | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
QLVD | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.13 | $49.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.53% | -1.19% |
| AuM | $61.73 M | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.14% | 0.35% |
QLVD | DBEF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | FlexShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 159 | 657 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 16, 2019 | June 8, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the QLVD and DBEF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, QLVD is up 4.81% year-to-date (YTD), while DBEF has returned 3.61%. That puts QLVD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLVD or DBEF?
Year-to-date, the QLVD ETF saw +$66K in flows, compared to -$63M for DBEF.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLVD or DBEF?
Over the past year, QLVD had a volatility of 11.74%, while DBEF experienced 13.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLVD or DBEF?
As of March 10, 2026, QLVD holds $61.73 M in assets under management (AUM), while DBEF manages $8.41 B.
What sectors do the QLVD and DBEF ETFs invest in?
QLVD leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, DBEF focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the QLVD ETF and DBEF ETF?
QLVD top holdings include NOVARTIS, GB00BVZK7T90 and ROYAL BK CANADA. DBEF holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: QLVD or DBEF?
QLVD holds 167 securities with 25.56% of its assets in the top 15. DBEF has 697 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.46%.
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
