QLCvsSFLRETF Comparison
VS
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. QLC is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.26%, versus 0.89% for SFLR. QLC is up 13.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$191M in YTD flows. SFLR performs worse with 5.38% YTD performance, and +$722M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QLC and SFLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
QLC vs SFLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | QLC SFLR | +1.18%-0.04% | +7.38%+4.84% | +13.59%+5.38% | +27.41%+12.93% | +89.48%+48.66% | +97.82%n/a |
| Flows | QLC SFLR | +$27M+$50M | +$60M+$403M | +$191M+$722M | +$301M+$1.09B | +$589M+$1.82B | +$598M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | QLC SFLR | +13.31%+11.40% | +13.00%+9.83% | +15.17%+10.20% | +17.09%n/a |
| Max drawdown | QLC SFLR | -4.16%-3.78% | -8.90%-6.81% | -18.73%-12.23% | -23.78%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | QLC SFLR | 30d62d | 63d113d | 124d139d | 702dn/a |
Trading data
QLC | SFLR | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $91.59 | $38.74 |
| Previous close 08/03/2026 | $90.44 | $38.35 |
| Consolidated volume 08/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
SFLR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexQLC | SFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QLC | SFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $91.59 | $38.74 |
| 1D performance | +1.27% | +1.00% |
| AuM | $1.03 B | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.26% | 0.89% |
Characteristics
QLC | SFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | FlexShares | Innovator |
| Benchmark | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 176 | 185 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 23, 2015 | November 9, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
QLC
USA
97.84%
Other
2.16%
SFLR
USA
95.96%
Other
4.04%
Sectors
QLC
Technology
46.01%
Finance
16.65%
Healthcare
9.74%
Other
27.59%
SFLR
Technology
43.99%
Finance
12.72%
Healthcare
9.26%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.6%
Industrials
7.52%
Other
17.91%
Advertisement
Diversification
QLC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.64%
SFLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
43.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
QLC
NVIDIA Corp.
6.96%
Apple, Inc.
6.75%
Alphabet, Inc.
4.10%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.64%
Microsoft Corp.
3.40%
Broadcom Inc.
2.84%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.31%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.87%
Johnson & Johnson
1.85%
Citigroup, Inc.
1.81%
KLA Corp.
1.66%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.58%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.53%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.43%
SFLR
NVIDIA Corp.
7.11%
Apple, Inc.
6.53%
Microsoft Corp.
4.01%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.63%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.12%
Broadcom Inc.
2.81%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.68%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.41%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.80%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.77%
Tesla, Inc.
1.71%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.70%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.63%
Johnson & Johnson
1.34%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.30%
Frequently asked questions about QLC and SFLR
How have the QLC and SFLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 3, 2026, QLC is up 13.59% year-to-date (YTD), while SFLR has returned 5.38%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QLC or SFLR?
Year-to-date, the QLC ETF saw +$191M in flows, compared to +$722M for SFLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: QLC or SFLR?
Over the past year, QLC had a volatility of 13%, while SFLR experienced 9.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: QLC or SFLR?
As of August 3, 2026, QLC holds $1.03 B in assets under management (AUM), while SFLR manages $2.14 B.
What sectors do the QLC and SFLR ETFs invest in?
QLC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, SFLR focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the QLC ETF and SFLR ETF?
QLC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Alphabet, Inc.. SFLR holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: QLC or SFLR?
QLC holds 177 securities with 43.64% of its assets in the top 15. SFLR has 187 securities and a top 15 weight of 43.55%.
Advertisement
Latest news about QLC & SFLR
How Innovator's "Managed Floor" ETFs Can Fit Into a 40/30/30 Portfolio
October 3, 2024
SFLR
Advertisement
Advertisement
