New

Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →

Advertisement
Advertisement

QCLNvsTANETF Comparison

ETF 1
QCLN

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.68%
VS
ETF 2
TAN

Invesco Solar ETF

This fund is part of
Alternative Energy
-1.68%

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund ETF (QCLN) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. QCLN's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, TAN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. QCLN is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.7% for TAN. QCLN is up 8.79% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. TAN performs worse with -4.09% YTD performance, and +$118M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of QCLN and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

QCLN vs TAN performance and flow charts

Performance

-10.0-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Aug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Cumulative Flows

-200 M-150 M-100 M-50 M0 MAug 10Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
QCLN
TAN
-6.81%-10.47%
-15.24%-24.01%
+8.79%-4.09%
+28.77%+12.63%
+6.61%-14.82%
-24.03%-44.36%
Flows
QCLN
TAN
-$15M-$224M
-$118M-$480M
-$10M+$118M
-$7M+$255M
-$600M-$80M
-$1.09B-$575M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
QCLN
TAN
+45.98%+35.23%
+41.13%+34.85%
+37.58%+36.25%
+39.32%+36.27%
Max drawdown
QCLN
TAN
-28.86%-25.39%
-32.10%-36.40%
-47.01%-53.60%
-69.47%-73.61%
Max drawdown duration
QCLN
TAN
80d89d
100d103d
761d866d
1767d1775d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
QCLN
TAN
Last sale
9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
$49.49
$47.15
Previous close
09/10/2026
$48.52
$47.04
Consolidated volume
09/10/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
QCLN
TAN
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
QCLN
TAN
Last price
$49.49
$47.15
1D performance
+2.00%
+0.23%
AuM$557.76 M$996.09 M
E/R0.56%0.7%
Characteristics
QCLN
TAN
Management strategyPassivePassive
ProviderFirst TrustInvesco
BenchmarkNASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy IndexMAC Global Solar Energy Stock Index
N° of holdings5135
Asset classEquitiesEquities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateFebruary 8, 2007April 15, 2008
ESGYesYes
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

QCLN
USA
91.75%
Other
8.25%
TAN
USA
44.51%
Israel
22.15%
China
8.15%
Other
25.19%

Sectors

QCLN
Industrials
30.9%
Technology
30.05%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.63%
Non-Energy Materi.
11.25%
Utilities
9.24%
Other
3.93%
TAN
Industrials
44.91%
Utilities
34.17%
Technology
10.53%
Other
10.38%
Advertisement

Diversification

QCLN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

74.15%
TAN

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

73.02%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
QCLN
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
8.87%
Tesla, Inc.
8.40%
Bloom Energy Corp.
7.53%
First Solar, Inc.
7.40%
ON Semiconductor Corp.
6.57%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.93%
Albemarle Corp.
4.03%
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
4.02%
Acuity, Inc.
3.74%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
3.60%
MP Materials Corp.
3.54%
Nextpower, Inc.
2.98%
Vicor Corp.
2.54%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
2.50%
EnerSys
2.50%
TAN
Nextpower, Inc.
9.93%
First Solar, Inc.
9.73%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
7.54%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
6.29%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.59%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
4.39%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
4.24%
Sunrun, Inc.
4.18%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.54%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
3.50%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.37%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.16%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.
2.95%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.90%
SMA Solar Technology AG
2.69%
Frequently asked questions about QCLN and TAN

How have the QCLN and TAN ETFs performed in 2026?

As of September 10, 2026, QCLN is up 8.79% year-to-date (YTD), while TAN has lost -4.09%. That puts QCLN better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: QCLN or TAN?

Year-to-date, the QCLN ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to +$118M for TAN.

Which ETF is more volatile: QCLN or TAN?

Over the past year, QCLN had a volatility of 41.13%, while TAN experienced 34.85%.

Which ETF is bigger: QCLN or TAN?

As of September 10, 2026, QCLN holds $557.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while TAN manages $996.09 M.

What sectors do the QCLN and TAN ETFs invest in?

QCLN leans toward sectors like Industrials, Technology and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, TAN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the QCLN ETF and TAN ETF?

QCLN top holdings include Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., Tesla, Inc. and Bloom Energy Corp.. TAN holds in its top three: Nextpower, Inc., First Solar, Inc. and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd..

Which ETF is more diversified: QCLN or TAN?

QCLN holds 51 securities with 74.15% of its assets in the top 15. TAN has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.02%.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up