PYPYvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
YieldMax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PYPY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.31%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. PYPY is down -7.44% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$3.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PYPY and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PYPY vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PYPY GPIQ | +1.91%-1.34% | -2.23%+5.41% | -7.44%+16.68% | -20.82%+16.08% | +14.05%+97.52% | n/an/a |
| Flows | PYPY GPIQ | +$9M+$553M | +$15M+$1.40B | +$1M+$3.70B | -$3M+$4.36B | +$77M+$6.11B | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PYPY GPIQ | +32.82%+16.00% | +38.11%+17.30% | +32.14%+17.93% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PYPY GPIQ | -15.05%-5.87% | -42.39%-9.57% | -53.34%-21.18% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PYPY GPIQ | 63d21d | 364d75d | 679d124d | n/an/a |
PYPY | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.21 | $56.80 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $25.93 | $56.49 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PYPY | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $26.21 | $56.80 |
| 1D performance | +1.09% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $24.18 M | $6.49 B |
| E/R | 1.31% | 0.35% |
PYPY | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | YieldMax ETFs | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2023 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
