PSFMvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both PSFM and QYLD have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%. PSFM is up 12.34% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSFM and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSFM vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSFM QYLD | +0.96%+1.24% | +2.33%+4.86% | +12.34%+13.56% | +15.32%+20.25% | +46.69%+52.89% | +59.09%+49.30% |
| Flows | PSFM QYLD | -+$42M | +$875K+$58M | +$3M-$166M | +$982K-$263M | -$430K+$85M | +$8M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSFM QYLD | +3.81%+9.78% | +4.39%+11.16% | +8.89%+13.51% | +10.53%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | PSFM QYLD | -0.86%-3.58% | -1.51%-5.84% | -14.20%-19.06% | -14.20%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PSFM QYLD | 8d10d | 10d39d | 173d239d | 173d771d |
Trading data
PSFM | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.77 | $18.29 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $35.90 | $18.32 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PSFM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPSFM | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSFM | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.77 | $18.29 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.16% |
| AuM | $25.95 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
PSFM | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 4, 2021 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSFM
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PSFM
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PSFM
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PSFM
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PSFM and QYLD
How have the PSFM and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PSFM is up 12.34% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSFM or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the PSFM ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSFM or QYLD?
Over the past year, PSFM had a volatility of 4.39%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSFM or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, PSFM holds $25.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PSFM & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
