PSCXvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. Both PSCX and QYLD have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%. PSCX is up 8.18% year-to-date (YTD) with +$12M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSCX and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSCX vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSCX QYLD | +1.09%+1.24% | +2.34%+4.86% | +8.18%+13.56% | +11.88%+20.25% | +43.43%+52.89% | +51.57%+49.30% |
| Flows | PSCX QYLD | -+$42M | -+$58M | +$12M-$166M | +$10M-$263M | +$27M+$85M | +$34M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSCX QYLD | +4.26%+9.78% | +5.55%+11.16% | +7.03%+13.51% | +7.46%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | PSCX QYLD | -1.07%-3.58% | -4.32%-5.84% | -9.67%-19.06% | -10.18%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PSCX QYLD | 8d10d | 70d39d | 112d239d | 513d771d |
Trading data
PSCX | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.56 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $33.73 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PSCX
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPSCX | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSCX | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.56 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.49% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $47.00 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
PSCX | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Global X |
| Benchmark | - | CBOE Nasdaq 100 BuyWrite V2 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 23, 2020 | December 11, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSCX
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PSCX
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PSCX
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PSCX
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PSCX and QYLD
How have the PSCX and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCX is up 8.18% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSCX or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the PSCX ETF saw +$12M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSCX or QYLD?
Over the past year, PSCX had a volatility of 5.55%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSCX or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCX holds $47.00 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PSCX & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
