PSCQvsHELOETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PSCQ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.5% for HELO. PSCQ is up 9.37% year-to-date (YTD) with -$4M in YTD flows. HELO performs worse with 4.62% YTD performance, and +$1.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PSCQ and HELO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PSCQ vs HELO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PSCQ HELO | +1.04%+1.14% | +2.90%+1.63% | +9.37%+4.62% | +12.00%+7.59% | +41.13%+39.50% | +55.64%n/a |
| Flows | PSCQ HELO | +$825K+$78M | +$40K+$618M | -$4M+$1.07B | +$3M+$1.14B | +$32M+$4.25B | +$37M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PSCQ HELO | +4.32%+7.26% | +5.90%+7.02% | +6.98%+7.84% | +7.62%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PSCQ HELO | -1.12%-2.37% | -4.62%-5.83% | -9.99%-10.86% | -9.99%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PSCQ HELO | 8d61d | 70d73d | 110d169d | 110dn/a |
Trading data
PSCQ | HELO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.26 | $69.21 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $32.44 | $69.67 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PSCQ | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.26 | $69.21 |
| 1D performance | -0.55% | -0.66% |
| AuM | $48.43 M | $4.86 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
PSCQ | HELO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 30, 2021 | September 28, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PSCQ
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PSCQ
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Diversification
PSCQ
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PSCQ
Data will be available soon
HELO
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PSCQ and HELO
How have the PSCQ and HELO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCQ is up 9.37% year-to-date (YTD), while HELO has returned 4.62%. That puts PSCQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PSCQ or HELO?
Year-to-date, the PSCQ ETF saw -$4M in flows, compared to +$1.07B for HELO.
Which ETF is more volatile: PSCQ or HELO?
Over the past year, PSCQ had a volatility of 5.9%, while HELO experienced 7.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: PSCQ or HELO?
As of October 16, 2026, PSCQ holds $48.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while HELO manages $4.86 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PSCQ & HELO
Hedged Equity ETFs: Options-Based Alternatives to the 60/40 Portfolio
March 25, 2025
HELO
Advertisement
Advertisement
