Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PQNTvsEFAETF Comparison
Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. PQNT's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, EFA's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. PQNT is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.3%, versus 0.32% for EFA. PQNT is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD) with -$1M in YTD flows. EFA performs better with 3.25% YTD performance, and +$354M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PQNT and EFA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PQNT vs EFA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PQNT EFA | -3.78%-5.54% | +5.00%+3.98% | +2.71%+3.25% | n/a+24.83% | n/a+59.71% | n/a+52.31% |
| Flows | PQNT EFA | -$1M- | -$1M+$1.20B | -$1M+$354M | -+$3.17B | -+$4.95B | -+$2.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PQNT EFA | +15.39%+14.66% | n/a+16.27% | n/a+14.20% | n/a+15.75% |
| Max drawdown | PQNT EFA | -7.78%-6.80% | n/a-13.68% | n/a-13.68% | n/a-29.40% |
| Max drawdown duration | PQNT EFA | 9d14d | n/a41d | n/a41d | n/a892d |
PQNT | EFA | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 2:57 PM | $21.18 | $97.65 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $21.48 | $99.01 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PQNT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PQNT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.18 | $97.65 |
| 1D performance | -1.39% | -1.37% |
| AuM | $8.65 M | $73.04 B |
| E/R | 0.3% | 0.32% |
PQNT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Pictet Asset Management | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI EAFE Index |
| N° of holdings | 225 | 657 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 15, 2025 | August 14, 2001 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PQNT and EFA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, PQNT is up 2.71% year-to-date (YTD), while EFA has returned 3.25%. That puts EFA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PQNT or EFA?
Year-to-date, the PQNT ETF saw -$1M in flows, compared to +$354M for EFA.
Which ETF is bigger: PQNT or EFA?
As of March 10, 2026, PQNT holds $8.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while EFA manages $73.04 B.
What sectors do the PQNT and EFA ETFs invest in?
PQNT leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EFA focuses on Financials, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PQNT ETF and EFA ETF?
PQNT top holdings include ASML HOLDING, SAP SE and SONY GROUP CORPORATION. EFA holds in its top three: ASML HOLDING, ROCHE and HSBC HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: PQNT or EFA?
PQNT holds 232 securities with 21.01% of its assets in the top 15. EFA has 695 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.62%.
ETF Takeover: Discover the Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF (PQNT)
What's the Fund | Pictet AI Enhanced International Equity ETF
The “Sell America” Trade, Part 2: Top International ETFs to Watch For 2026
Currency Risk in International Equity ETFs: To Hedge or Not to Hedge?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
