POCTvsDIVOETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. POCT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.56% for DIVO. POCT is up 9.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$133M in YTD flows. DIVO performs better with 11.4% YTD performance, and +$1.73B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POCT and DIVO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POCT vs DIVO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POCT DIVO | +1.05%+2.03% | +2.72%+3.64% | +9.19%+11.40% | +11.96%+16.33% | +39.67%+60.32% | +60.98%+70.24% |
| Flows | POCT DIVO | +$122M+$113M | +$83M+$375M | -$133M+$1.73B | -$61M+$2.24B | +$212M+$3.73B | +$501M+$5.98B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POCT DIVO | +4.04%+8.36% | +5.85%+9.37% | +7.31%+10.63% | +8.21%+11.80% |
| Max drawdown | POCT DIVO | -1.00%-4.23% | -4.50%-5.92% | -10.18%-12.14% | -10.18%-13.52% |
| Max drawdown duration | POCT DIVO | 3d43d | 44d114d | 107d130d | 107d329d |
POCT | DIVO | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.99 | $47.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $48.29 | $47.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
POCT | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.99 | $47.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $1.08 B | $8.01 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.56% |
POCT | DIVO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Amplify ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2018 | December 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
