PHOvsKMIDETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PHO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, KMID's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. PHO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.8% for KMID. PHO is down -3.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$105M in YTD flows. KMID performs worse with -3.41% YTD performance, and +$6M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PHO and KMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PHO vs KMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHO KMID | -7.11%-7.75% | +3.63%-4.24% | -3.02%-3.41% | -3.49%-4.46% | +25.66%n/a | +19.34%n/a |
| Flows | PHO KMID | -$30M-$1M | -$90M-$3M | -$105M+$6M | -$206M+$13M | -$333M- | -$416M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PHO KMID | +17.65%+13.30% | +15.97%+15.01% | +16.66%n/a | +18.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PHO KMID | -7.22%-8.30% | -13.83%-10.69% | -19.26%n/a | -28.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PHO KMID | 32d32d | 324d192d | 250dn/a | 715dn/a |
Trading data
PHO | KMID | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.49 | $23.74 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $68.07 | $23.49 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
KMID
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPHO | KMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PHO | KMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.49 | $23.74 |
| 1D performance | +0.62% | +1.05% |
| AuM | $1.91 B | $41.71 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
PHO | KMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | VIRTUS Investment Partners |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 26 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2005 | October 16, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PHO
USA
95.25%
Other
4.75%
KMID
USA
89.4%
Other
10.6%
Sectors
PHO
Industrials
45.27%
Healthcare
17.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.54%
Technology
14.66%
Utilities
7.47%
Other
0%
KMID
Industrials
42.4%
Finance
14.04%
Healthcare
13.72%
Technology
8.58%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.02%
Other
14.23%
Advertisement
Diversification
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.01%
KMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
65.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.37%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.29%
Waters Corp.
6.69%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.57%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.51%
Veralto Corp.
4.49%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.19%
Xylem, Inc.
4.17%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.87%
IDEX Corp.
3.61%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.33%
Pentair plc
3.17%
AECOM
3.01%
Trimble, Inc.
2.94%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.80%
KMID
AMETEK, Inc.
6.15%
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
5.65%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
5.50%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
5.17%
Ross Stores, Inc.
4.87%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
4.69%
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
4.47%
HEICO Corp.
4.06%
Allegion Plc
4.05%
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
4.04%
Lennox International, Inc.
3.54%
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
3.43%
MSCI, Inc.
3.41%
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
3.39%
Align Technology, Inc.
3.36%
Frequently asked questions about PHO and KMID
How have the PHO and KMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, PHO is down -3.02% year-to-date (YTD), while KMID has lost -3.41%. That puts PHO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PHO or KMID?
Year-to-date, the PHO ETF saw -$105M in flows, compared to +$6M for KMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: PHO or KMID?
Over the past year, PHO had a volatility of 15.97%, while KMID experienced 15.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: PHO or KMID?
As of September 10, 2026, PHO holds $1.91 B in assets under management (AUM), while KMID manages $41.71 M.
What sectors do the PHO and KMID ETFs invest in?
PHO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, KMID focuses on Industrials, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PHO ETF and KMID ETF?
PHO top holdings include Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp.. KMID holds in its top three: AMETEK, Inc., Teledyne Technologies, Inc. and Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PHO or KMID?
PHO holds 40 securities with 73.01% of its assets in the top 15. KMID has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.78%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PHO & KMID
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
