PHOvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PHO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, JHMM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. PHO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. PHO is down -3.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$105M in YTD flows. JHMM performs better with 11.92% YTD performance, and +$822M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PHO and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PHO vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHO JHMM | -7.11%-4.19% | +3.63%+1.71% | -3.02%+11.92% | -3.49%+14.78% | +25.66%+53.95% | +19.34%+45.08% |
| Flows | PHO JHMM | -$30M+$80M | -$90M+$353M | -$105M+$822M | -$206M+$936M | -$333M+$1.09B | -$416M+$2.08B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PHO JHMM | +17.65%+11.90% | +15.97%+14.14% | +16.66%+16.30% | +18.45%+18.25% |
| Max drawdown | PHO JHMM | -7.22%-5.57% | -13.83%-8.57% | -19.26%-21.83% | -28.58%-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | PHO JHMM | 32d25d | 324d49d | 250d269d | 715d835d |
Trading data
PHO | JHMM | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $68.48 | $73.82 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $68.07 | $73.08 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PHO | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PHO | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.48 | $73.82 |
| 1D performance | +0.60% | +1.01% |
| AuM | $1.91 B | $5.94 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
PHO | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 651 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2005 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PHO
USA
95.25%
Other
4.75%
JHMM
USA
95.28%
Other
4.72%
Sectors
PHO
Industrials
45.27%
Healthcare
17.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.54%
Technology
14.66%
Utilities
7.47%
Other
0%
JHMM
Finance
22.9%
Industrials
16.41%
Technology
14.74%
Healthcare
11.04%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.84%
Other
27.07%
Advertisement
Diversification
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.01%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.37%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.29%
Waters Corp.
6.69%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.57%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.51%
Veralto Corp.
4.49%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.19%
Xylem, Inc.
4.17%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.87%
IDEX Corp.
3.61%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.33%
Pentair plc
3.17%
AECOM
3.01%
Trimble, Inc.
2.94%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.80%
JHMM
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.66%
Flex Ltd.
0.62%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.56%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.53%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.52%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.51%
State Street Corp.
0.48%
eBay, Inc.
0.48%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.47%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
0.46%
Entergy Corp.
0.45%
Coherent Corp.
0.45%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.45%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about PHO and JHMM
How have the PHO and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, PHO is down -3.02% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 11.92%. That puts JHMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PHO or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the PHO ETF saw -$105M in flows, compared to +$822M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: PHO or JHMM?
Over the past year, PHO had a volatility of 15.97%, while JHMM experienced 14.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: PHO or JHMM?
As of September 10, 2026, PHO holds $1.91 B in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $5.94 B.
What sectors do the PHO and JHMM ETFs invest in?
PHO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PHO ETF and JHMM ETF?
PHO top holdings include Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp.. JHMM holds in its top three: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Flex Ltd. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PHO or JHMM?
PHO holds 40 securities with 73.01% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 658 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.55%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PHO & JHMM
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
