PFEBvsQYLDETF Comparison
ETF 1
PFEB
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
+0.56%
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - February (PFEB) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PFEB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. PFEB is up 8.99% year-to-date (YTD) with +$92M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 14.89% YTD performance, and -$157M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PFEB and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PFEB vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PFEB QYLD | +0.60%+0.16% | +3.03%+7.75% | +8.99%+14.89% | +10.64%+18.90% | +49.56%+61.52% | +53.41%+50.05% |
| Flows | PFEB QYLD | -$8M-$27M | -$45M-$5M | +$92M-$157M | +$11M-$173M | +$175M+$106M | +$423M+$4.78B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PFEB QYLD | +4.24%+9.99% | +5.77%+11.32% | +7.41%+13.49% | +8.60%+15.30% |
| Max drawdown | PFEB QYLD | -0.83%-2.63% | -4.70%-5.84% | -10.55%-19.06% | -10.60%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PFEB QYLD | 15d12d | 70d39d | 110d239d | 413d771d |
Trading data
PFEB | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $44.47 | $18.45 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $44.40 | $18.37 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PFEB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPFEB | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PFEB | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $44.47 | $18.45 |
| 1D performance | +0.17% | +0.44% |
| AuM | $893.62 M | $8.41 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PFEB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PFEB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PFEB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PFEB
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PFEB and QYLD
How have the PFEB and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, PFEB is up 8.99% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 14.89%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PFEB or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the PFEB ETF saw +$92M in flows, compared to -$157M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PFEB or QYLD?
Over the past year, PFEB had a volatility of 5.77%, while QYLD experienced 11.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: PFEB or QYLD?
As of October 27, 2026, PFEB holds $893.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.41 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PFEB & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
