PDECvsQYLDETF Comparison
ETF 1
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PDEC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. PDEC is up 9.06% year-to-date (YTD) with -$127M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PDEC and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PDEC vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PDEC QYLD | +1.26%+1.24% | +2.44%+4.86% | +9.06%+13.56% | +13.03%+20.25% | +43.98%+52.89% | +52.41%+49.30% |
| Flows | PDEC QYLD | -$5M+$42M | -$19M+$58M | -$127M-$166M | -$72M-$263M | +$77M+$85M | +$510M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PDEC QYLD | +4.82%+9.78% | +6.58%+11.16% | +7.89%+13.51% | +9.22%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | PDEC QYLD | -1.20%-3.58% | -4.73%-5.84% | -10.60%-19.06% | -11.44%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PDEC QYLD | 14d10d | 75d39d | 124d239d | 498d771d |
Trading data
PDEC | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.27 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $47.50 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PDEC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPDEC | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PDEC | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.27 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.48% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $988.50 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PDEC
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PDEC
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PDEC
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PDEC
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PDEC and QYLD
How have the PDEC and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PDEC is up 9.06% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PDEC or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the PDEC ETF saw -$127M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PDEC or QYLD?
Over the past year, PDEC had a volatility of 6.58%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: PDEC or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, PDEC holds $988.50 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PDEC & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
