Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBJvsPSLETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Staples. PBJ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Materials. In contrast, PSL's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary.Financials, PBJ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.74% for PSL. PBJ is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. PSL performs better with 10.32% YTD performance, and -$1M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBJ and PSL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBJ vs PSL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBJ PSL | -3.17%-2.01% | +7.45%+9.50% | +8.77%+10.32% | +10.69%+6.35% | +15.25%+39.87% | +30.79%+25.45% |
| Flows | PBJ PSL | -$12M- | -$15M-$1M | -$13M-$1M | -$11M-$3M | -$238M-$53M | +$7M-$33M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBJ PSL | +12.15%+11.81% | +14.44%+14.91% | +12.62%+13.25% | +13.72%+15.13% |
| Max drawdown | PBJ PSL | -4.72%-5.43% | -12.44%-13.65% | -14.70%-13.65% | -15.63%-22.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBJ PSL | 11d11d | 194d172d | 297d172d | 692d995d |
PBJ | PSL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.92 | $110.77 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.72 | $110.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBJ | PSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBJ | PSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.92 | $110.77 |
| 1D performance | +0.41% | -0.03% |
| AuM | $89.67 M | $90.86 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.74% |
PBJ | PSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index | Dorsey Wright Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index |
| N° of holdings | 28 | 46 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2005 | October 12, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBJ and PSL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PBJ is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD), while PSL has returned 10.32%. That puts PSL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBJ or PSL?
Year-to-date, the PBJ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to -$1M for PSL.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBJ or PSL?
Over the past year, PBJ had a volatility of 14.44%, while PSL experienced 14.91%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBJ or PSL?
As of March 12, 2026, PBJ holds $89.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while PSL manages $90.86 M.
What sectors do the PBJ and PSL ETFs invest in?
PBJ leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, PSL focuses on Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PBJ ETF and PSL ETF?
PBJ top holdings include MONSTER BEVERAGE, CORTEVA INC and HERSHEY FOODS. PSL holds in its top three: CASEYS GENERAL STORES, COSTCO WHOLESALE and CHURCH AND DWIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBJ or PSL?
PBJ holds 30 securities with 59.97% of its assets in the top 15. PSL has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.01%.
Can You Bet on Soaring Cocoa Prices with ETFs? Kind Of – Here's How
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
3 food and beverage ETFs for hungry investors
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
