Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBJvsPSCCETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Staples. PBJ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Materials. In contrast, PSCC's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples PBJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.29% for PSCC. PBJ is up 9.3% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. PSCC performs worse with 6.81% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBJ and PSCC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBJ vs PSCC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBJ PSCC | -3.46%-4.35% | +7.41%+2.42% | +9.30%+6.81% | +12.83%-2.37% | +15.81%+1.44% | +30.68%+2.79% |
| Flows | PBJ PSCC | -$8M-$348K | -$15M-$2M | -$13M-$2M | -$11M-$11M | -$238M-$16M | +$7M-$9M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBJ PSCC | +12.14%+13.13% | +14.38%+17.96% | +12.61%+17.17% | +13.72%+18.22% |
| Max drawdown | PBJ PSCC | -4.72%-7.14% | -12.44%-15.17% | -14.70%-23.29% | -15.63%-23.29% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBJ PSCC | 12d17d | 194d233d | 297d458d | 692d458d |
PBJ | PSCC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.91 | $33.17 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.72 | $32.99 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBJ | PSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBJ | PSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.91 | $33.17 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | +0.55% |
| AuM | $90.10 M | $33.84 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.29% |
PBJ | PSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Food & Beverage Intellidex Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Capped Consumer Staples Index |
| N° of holdings | 28 | 23 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 23, 2005 | April 7, 2010 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBJ and PSCC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, PBJ is up 9.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PSCC has returned 6.81%. That puts PBJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBJ or PSCC?
Year-to-date, the PBJ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to -$2M for PSCC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBJ or PSCC?
Over the past year, PBJ had a volatility of 14.38%, while PSCC experienced 17.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBJ or PSCC?
As of March 13, 2026, PBJ holds $90.10 M in assets under management (AUM), while PSCC manages $33.84 M.
What sectors do the PBJ and PSCC ETFs invest in?
PBJ leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, PSCC focuses on Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the PBJ ETF and PSCC ETF?
PBJ top holdings include MONSTER BEVERAGE, CORTEVA INC and HERSHEY FOODS. PSCC holds in its top three: CAL MAINE FOODS, PRICESMART and FRESHPET.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBJ or PSCC?
PBJ holds 30 securities with 59.97% of its assets in the top 15. PSCC has 23 securities and a top 15 weight of 82.75%.
Can You Bet on Soaring Cocoa Prices with ETFs? Kind Of – Here's How
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
3 food and beverage ETFs for hungry investors
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
