Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PBJvsGXPSETF Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Staples. PBJ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Materials. In contrast, GXPS's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples and Consumer Discretionary. PBJ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.61%, versus 0.25% for GXPS. PBJ is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. GXPS performs better with 10.01% YTD performance, and +$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBJ and GXPS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PBJ vs GXPS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBJ GXPS | -3.17%-4.78% | +7.45%+8.49% | +8.77%+10.01% | +10.69%n/a | +15.25%n/a | +30.79%n/a |
| Flows | PBJ GXPS | -$12M+$5M | -$15M+$16M | -$13M+$13M | -$11M- | -$238M- | +$7M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBJ GXPS | +12.15%+14.39% | +14.44%n/a | +12.62%n/a | +13.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PBJ GXPS | -4.72%-5.52% | -12.44%n/a | -14.70%n/a | -15.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PBJ GXPS | 11d11d | 194dn/a | 297dn/a | 692dn/a |
PBJ | GXPS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $48.91 | $26.97 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $48.72 | $26.78 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PBJ | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PBJ | GXPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.91 | $26.97 |
| 1D performance | +0.39% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $89.67 M | $47.69 M |
| E/R | 0.61% | 0.25% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PBJ and GXPS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PBJ is up 8.77% year-to-date (YTD), while GXPS has returned 10.01%. That puts GXPS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBJ or GXPS?
Year-to-date, the PBJ ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$13M for GXPS.
Which ETF is bigger: PBJ or GXPS?
As of March 12, 2026, PBJ holds $89.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while GXPS manages $47.69 M.
What sectors do the PBJ and GXPS ETFs invest in?
PBJ leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples. Meanwhile, GXPS focuses on Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the PBJ ETF and GXPS ETF?
PBJ top holdings include MONSTER BEVERAGE, CORTEVA INC and HERSHEY FOODS. GXPS holds in its top three: WALMART INC, COSTCO WHOLESALE and PROCTERGAMBLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: PBJ or GXPS?
PBJ holds 30 securities with 59.97% of its assets in the top 15. GXPS has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 87.82%.
Can You Bet on Soaring Cocoa Prices with ETFs? Kind Of – Here's How
Analyzing the Potential ETF Winners & Losers from The Weight-Loss Drug Craze
3 food and beverage ETFs for hungry investors
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
