PAPRvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. PAPR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. PAPR is up 10.37% year-to-date (YTD) with +$86M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 12.12% YTD performance, and +$3.83B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PAPR and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PAPR vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PAPR GPIQ | +0.09%-5.54% | +1.92%+0.99% | +10.37%+12.12% | +11.96%+11.83% | +43.40%+87.89% | +48.40%n/a |
| Flows | PAPR GPIQ | -+$640M | -$10M+$1.45B | +$86M+$3.83B | +$63M+$4.43B | +$85M+$6.24B | +$400M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PAPR GPIQ | +2.84%+15.69% | +3.54%+17.60% | +7.44%+18.02% | +8.50%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PAPR GPIQ | -0.61%-7.44% | -1.31%-9.57% | -11.75%-21.18% | -11.75%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PAPR GPIQ | 15d24d | 11d75d | 156d124d | 156dn/a |
PAPR | GPIQ | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $43.15 | $53.11 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $43.28 | $54.29 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PAPR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.15 | $53.11 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -2.17% |
| AuM | $959.18 M | $6.36 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
PAPR | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 1, 2019 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
