Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OIHvsFCGETF Comparison
VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) and First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) belong to the same industry segment: US Energy. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Energy. OIH is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.57% for FCG. OIH is up 35.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$610M in YTD flows. FCG performs worse with 21.19% YTD performance, and +$101M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OIH and FCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OIH vs FCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OIH FCG | +0.91%+9.04% | +26.91%+14.96% | +35.32%+21.19% | +57.56%+27.45% | +43.83%+37.65% | +85.45%+135.26% |
| Flows | OIH FCG | -$30M+$68M | +$703M+$104M | +$610M+$101M | +$648M+$162M | -$468M-$59M | +$76M+$219M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OIH FCG | +31.44%+27.31% | +37.93%+32.66% | +32.03%+27.53% | +37.76%+34.33% |
| Max drawdown | OIH FCG | -8.36%-8.26% | -26.32%-23.18% | -43.83%-29.46% | -43.83%-33.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | OIH FCG | 22d47d | 183d244d | 864d679d | 864d1353d |
OIH | FCG | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $385.02 | $29.11 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $382.26 | $28.36 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OIH | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OIH | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $385.02 | $29.11 |
| 1D performance | +0.72% | +2.64% |
| AuM | $2.44 B | $648.23 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.57% |
OIH | FCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | First Trust |
| Benchmark | MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index | ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 33 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 20, 2011 | May 8, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OIH and FCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, OIH is up 35.32% year-to-date (YTD), while FCG has returned 21.19%. That puts OIH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OIH or FCG?
Year-to-date, the OIH ETF saw +$610M in flows, compared to +$101M for FCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: OIH or FCG?
Over the past year, OIH had a volatility of 37.93%, while FCG experienced 32.66%.
Which ETF is bigger: OIH or FCG?
As of March 11, 2026, OIH holds $2.44 B in assets under management (AUM), while FCG manages $648.23 M.
What sectors do the OIH and FCG ETFs invest in?
OIH leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, FCG focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the OIH ETF and FCG ETF?
OIH top holdings include SCHLUMBERGER, BAKER HUGHES and HALLIBURTON. FCG holds in its top three: CONOCOPHILLIPS, OCCIDENTAL U and DIAMONDBACK ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: OIH or FCG?
OIH holds 25 securities with 87.5% of its assets in the top 15. FCG has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 61.83%.
ETF Comparison: VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) Versus VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK)
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Amid Summer Rally Speculations
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Amid Summer Rally Speculations
Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan
Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
