OALCvsIVVETF Comparison
VS
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. OALC's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IVV's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. OALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.03% for IVV. OALC is up 14.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$55M in YTD flows. IVV performs worse with 11.74% YTD performance, and +$24.82B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OALC and IVV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OALC vs IVV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OALC IVV | -1.41%-0.87% | +0.97%+2.19% | +14.35%+11.74% | +14.62%+12.37% | +88.64%+88.98% | n/a+76.17% |
| Flows | OALC IVV | +$16M-$2.82B | +$31M-$13.39B | +$55M+$24.82B | +$70M+$65.62B | +$161M+$200.48B | -+$255.55B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OALC IVV | +11.68%+10.86% | +14.38%+12.88% | +15.04%+14.96% | n/a+17.02% |
| Max drawdown | OALC IVV | -4.82%-3.03% | -8.61%-8.90% | -17.48%-18.75% | n/a-24.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | OALC IVV | 78d53d | 72d76d | 133d126d | n/a708d |
Trading data
OALC | IVV | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM | $40.43 | $755.46 |
| Previous close 10/30/2026 | $40.47 | $759.18 |
| Consolidated volume 10/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OALC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOALC | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
OALC | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.43 | $755.46 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | -0.49% |
| AuM | $276.21 M | $870.02 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
OALC | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 208 | 501 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OALC
USA
97.26%
Other
2.74%
IVV
USA
97.52%
Other
2.48%
Sectors
OALC
Technology
45.19%
Finance
12.66%
Industrials
8.55%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.01%
Healthcare
7.83%
Other
17.75%
IVV
Technology
47.61%
Finance
12.67%
Healthcare
9.08%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.59%
Industrials
7.28%
Other
14.77%
Advertisement
Diversification
OALC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.45%
IVV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
OALC
NVIDIA Corp.
8.52%
Microsoft Corp.
6.38%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.24%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.62%
Broadcom Inc.
2.61%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.87%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.68%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.63%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.57%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.52%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.46%
Visa, Inc.
1.26%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.16%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.09%
IVV
NVIDIA Corp.
8.37%
Apple, Inc.
7.36%
Microsoft Corp.
5.77%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.70%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.45%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.42%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.51%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.51%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.40%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.40%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.33%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.01%
Frequently asked questions about OALC and IVV
How have the OALC and IVV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, OALC is up 14.35% year-to-date (YTD), while IVV has returned 11.74%. That puts OALC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OALC or IVV?
Year-to-date, the OALC ETF saw +$55M in flows, compared to +$24.82B for IVV.
Which ETF is more volatile: OALC or IVV?
Over the past year, OALC had a volatility of 14.38%, while IVV experienced 12.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: OALC or IVV?
As of October 30, 2026, OALC holds $276.21 M in assets under management (AUM), while IVV manages $870.02 B.
What sectors do the OALC and IVV ETFs invest in?
OALC leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IVV focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OALC ETF and IVV ETF?
OALC top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.. IVV holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OALC or IVV?
OALC holds 211 securities with 40.45% of its assets in the top 15. IVV has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OALC & IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 26-30, 2026)
October 31, 2026
IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 19-23, 2026)
October 26, 2026
IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 12-16, 2026)
October 19, 2026
IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (October 5-9, 2026)
October 12, 2026
IVV
Advertisement
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (September 21-25, 2026)
September 26, 2026
IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (September 21-25, 2026)
September 26, 2026
IVV
ETF Comparison: NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF (IWMI) Versus Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD)
September 25, 2026
IVV
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (September 14-18, 2026)
September 19, 2026
IVV
Advertisement
