NLRvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. NLR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Materials. NLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.75% for URNM. NLR is up 8.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$819M in YTD flows. URNM performs better with 15.65% YTD performance, and +$194M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NLR and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NLR vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NLR URNM | -12.20%-14.76% | +1.58%+7.67% | +8.06%+15.65% | +83.28%+102.42% | +159.09%+123.12% | +182.63%+144.02% |
| Flows | NLR URNM | +$194M-$28M | +$819M+$194M | +$819M+$194M | +$2.84B-$62M | +$3.94B+$401M | +$3.97B+$1.20B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NLR URNM | +39.88%+49.61% | +37.85%+42.43% | +29.84%+35.12% | +25.41%+40.44% |
| Max drawdown | NLR URNM | -21.18%-28.40% | -25.64%-28.40% | -29.79%-50.18% | -29.79%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | NLR URNM | 64d63d | 104d63d | 116d485d | 116d485d |
Trading data
NLR | URNM | |
Last sale 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $133.67 | $63.41 |
| Previous close 04/02/2026 | $134.36 | $63.87 |
| Consolidated volume 04/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NLR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NLR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $133.67 | $63.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -0.72% |
| AuM | $4.64 B | $2.19 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
NLR | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 23 | 17 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 13, 2007 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NLR
USA
42.69%
Canada
26.21%
Australia
9.88%
Other
21.22%
URNM
Canada
38.83%
Australia
18.65%
USA
16.48%
Other
26.04%
Sectors
NLR
Energy
45.37%
Utilities
26.11%
Industrials
14.97%
Other
13.55%
URNM
Energy
69.78%
Other
30.22%
Advertisement
Diversification
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.95%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
81.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of February 28, 2026
NLR
CAMECO
8.82%
DENISON MINES
6.19%
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
5.78%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
5.55%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
5.39%
PALADIN ENERGY
5.37%
US63253R2013
5.22%
PG&E
5.18%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
4.86%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.69%
ENERGY FUELS
4.40%
CGN POWER CO LTD
4.17%
CGN MINING
4.09%
KEPCO E&C
3.64%
ALTC ACQUISITION
3.60%
URNM
CAMECO
20.15%
URANIUM ENERGY
11.64%
PALADIN ENERGY
6.11%
DEEP YELLOW
5.96%
DENISON MINES
5.54%
CGN MINING
5.22%
ENERGY FUELS
4.97%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.95%
US63253R2013
4.84%
YELLOW CAKE PLC
3.53%
AU000000BMN9
2.41%
UR ENERGY
2.31%
BOSS ENERGY
1.78%
HYLEA METALS
1.24%
GLOBAL ATOMIC CORP
0.91%
Frequently asked questions about NLR and URNM
How have the NLR and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 2, 2026, NLR is up 8.06% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has returned 15.65%. That puts URNM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NLR or URNM?
Year-to-date, the NLR ETF saw +$819M in flows, compared to +$194M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: NLR or URNM?
Over the past year, NLR had a volatility of 37.85%, while URNM experienced 42.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: NLR or URNM?
As of April 2, 2026, NLR holds $4.64 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $2.19 B.
What sectors do the NLR and URNM ETFs invest in?
NLR leans toward sectors like Energy, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy.
What are the top holdings of the NLR ETF and URNM ETF?
NLR top holdings include CAMECO, DENISON MINES and CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP. URNM holds in its top three: CAMECO, URANIUM ENERGY and PALADIN ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: NLR or URNM?
NLR holds 25 securities with 76.95% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 18 securities and a top 15 weight of 81.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NLR & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
URNM
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
