NLRvsURAETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. NLR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Financials. NLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.69% for URA. NLR is up 7.22% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.09B in YTD flows. URA performs better with 16.92% YTD performance, and +$850M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NLR and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NLR vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 05/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NLR URA | -9.54%-11.58% | -10.54%-7.81% | +7.22%+16.92% | +35.55%+58.61% | +165.09%+196.95% | +175.02%+180.60% |
| Flows | NLR URA | +$148M-$86M | +$472M+$24M | +$1.09B+$850M | +$3.16B+$1.84B | +$4.21B+$2.87B | +$4.24B+$3.91B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NLR URA | +38.17%+44.02% | +36.78%+43.10% | +30.81%+35.44% | +26.16%+37.00% |
| Max drawdown | NLR URA | -17.75%-18.19% | -25.64%-28.67% | -29.79%-36.76% | -29.79%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | NLR URA | 86d50d | 104d97d | 116d214d | 116d738d |
Trading data
NLR | URA | |
Last sale 5/28/2026 at 7:31 PM | $133.39 | $50.79 |
| Previous close 05/27/2026 | $132.52 | $50.16 |
| Consolidated volume 05/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/28/2026 at 7:31 PM
Live
Closed
NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $133.39 | $50.79 |
| 1D performance | +0.66% | +1.26% |
| AuM | $4.86 B | $6.96 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NLR
USA
48.48%
Canada
21.11%
Other
30.4%
URA
Canada
46.05%
USA
22.05%
Republic of Korea
13.15%
Australia
9.32%
Other
9.43%
Sectors
NLR
Energy
36.75%
Utilities
35.57%
Industrials
15.84%
Other
11.83%
URA
Energy
53.91%
Industrials
22.79%
Other
23.3%
Diversification
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.2%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
77.56%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
NLR
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.73%
CAMECO
7.83%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.45%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
6.33%
PG&E
5.73%
FORTUM
5.27%
CGN POWER CO LTD
5.07%
US63253R2013
4.74%
CEZ
4.44%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.37%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.24%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.23%
DENISON MINES
4.08%
ENERGY FUELS
4.05%
NUSCALE POWER CORPORATION
3.63%
URA
CAMECO
23.52%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
6.56%
URANIUM ENERGY
5.91%
ALTC ACQUISITION
5.57%
US63253R2013
5.27%
SPROTT PHYSICAL URANIUM UNIT
4.83%
ENERGY FUELS
3.93%
PALADIN ENERGY
3.46%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
3.31%
DENISON MINES
3.01%
CENTRUS ENERGY CORP
2.90%
BHP GROUP LTD
2.40%
DAEWOO ENG&CONST
2.39%
DOOSAN ENERBILITY
2.34%
ITOCHU
2.17%
Frequently asked questions about NLR and URA
How have the NLR and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of May 27, 2026, NLR is up 7.22% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has returned 16.92%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NLR or URA?
Year-to-date, the NLR ETF saw +$1.09B in flows, compared to +$850M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: NLR or URA?
Over the past year, NLR had a volatility of 36.78%, while URA experienced 43.1%.
Which ETF is bigger: NLR or URA?
As of May 27, 2026, NLR holds $4.86 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $6.96 B.
What sectors do the NLR and URA ETFs invest in?
NLR leans toward sectors like Energy, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NLR ETF and URA ETF?
NLR top holdings include CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, CAMECO and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC. URA holds in its top three: CAMECO, NEXGEN ENERGY LTD and URANIUM ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: NLR or URA?
NLR holds 25 securities with 79.2% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 77.56%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NLR & URA
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
NLR
URA
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
