NLRvsURAETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. NLR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. NLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.52%, versus 0.69% for URA. NLR is down -12.36% year-to-date (YTD) with +$976M in YTD flows. URA performs better with -6.62% YTD performance, and +$835M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NLR and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NLR vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NLR URA | -9.53%-10.92% | -24.95%-27.83% | -12.36%-6.62% | -7.57%-0.34% | +94.65%+109.75% | +134.30%+149.57% |
| Flows | NLR URA | -$100M+$36M | +$38M-$23M | +$976M+$835M | +$2.59B+$1.86B | +$4.10B+$2.82B | +$4.13B+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NLR URA | +37.87%+44.40% | +38.03%+44.75% | +31.73%+36.36% | +26.94%+37.49% |
| Max drawdown | NLR URA | -29.50%-33.01% | -35.69%-36.85% | -35.69%-36.85% | -35.69%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | NLR URA | 79d79d | 177d177d | 177d177d | 177d738d |
Trading data
NLR | URA | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $109.69 | $40.94 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $108.10 | $39.89 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NLR | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $109.69 | $40.94 |
| 1D performance | +1.47% | +2.63% |
| AuM | $3.86 B | $5.55 B |
| E/R | 0.52% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NLR
USA
51.95%
Canada
19.17%
Australia
7.33%
Other
21.56%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
NLR
Energy
39.99%
Utilities
30.17%
Industrials
25.07%
Other
4.77%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
82.89%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
NLR
Cameco Corp.
8.45%
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.31%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.12%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.52%
Fortum Oyj
5.61%
Oklo, Inc.
5.21%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.07%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.02%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.82%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.81%
Centrus Energy Corp.
4.77%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.65%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.33%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.28%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
3.92%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about NLR and URA
How have the NLR and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, NLR is down -12.36% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -6.62%. That puts URA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NLR or URA?
Year-to-date, the NLR ETF saw +$976M in flows, compared to +$835M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: NLR or URA?
Over the past year, NLR had a volatility of 38.03%, while URA experienced 44.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: NLR or URA?
As of July 24, 2026, NLR holds $3.86 B in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.55 B.
What sectors do the NLR and URA ETFs invest in?
NLR leans toward sectors like Energy, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the NLR ETF and URA ETF?
NLR top holdings include Cameco Corp., Constellation Energy Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: NLR or URA?
NLR holds 25 securities with 82.89% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NLR & URA
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
Hiding in Plain Sight: The Case for 'Unloved' Dividend Payers in ETFs
March 24, 2025
NLR
URA
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
