NAPRvsQYLDETF Comparison
VS
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. NAPR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.6% for QYLD. NAPR is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD) with -$20M in YTD flows. QYLD performs better with 13.56% YTD performance, and -$166M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NAPR and QYLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NAPR vs QYLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NAPR QYLD | +0.78%+1.24% | +2.75%+4.86% | +12.80%+13.56% | +15.39%+20.25% | +42.67%+52.89% | +58.90%+49.30% |
| Flows | NAPR QYLD | -$3M+$42M | -$6M+$58M | -$20M-$166M | -$31M-$263M | -$11M+$85M | +$76M+$4.84B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NAPR QYLD | +4.78%+9.78% | +4.75%+11.16% | +8.97%+13.51% | +11.50%+15.27% |
| Max drawdown | NAPR QYLD | -1.67%-3.58% | -2.23%-5.84% | -14.53%-19.06% | -16.02%-24.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | NAPR QYLD | 10d10d | 62d39d | 173d239d | 400d771d |
Trading data
NAPR | QYLD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.68 | $18.32 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $61.00 | $18.74 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NAPR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNAPR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NAPR | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.68 | $18.32 |
| 1D performance | -0.52% | -2.24% |
| AuM | $209.20 M | $8.38 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.6% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Sectors
NAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Diversification
NAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
NAPR
Data will be available soon
QYLD
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about NAPR and QYLD
How have the NAPR and QYLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, NAPR is up 12.8% year-to-date (YTD), while QYLD has returned 13.56%. That puts QYLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NAPR or QYLD?
Year-to-date, the NAPR ETF saw -$20M in flows, compared to -$166M for QYLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: NAPR or QYLD?
Over the past year, NAPR had a volatility of 4.75%, while QYLD experienced 11.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: NAPR or QYLD?
As of October 16, 2026, NAPR holds $209.20 M in assets under management (AUM), while QYLD manages $8.38 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about NAPR & QYLD
Access Unique Strategies Through These New Funds Trading on NYSE ARCA
March 20, 2023
QYLD
NUSI: an ETF with high yields and crash protection?
November 14, 2022
QYLD
Covered call ETFs: How did they perform in the 2022 bear market?
October 25, 2022
QYLD
Advertisement
Advertisement
