BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

MVFDvsXOPETF Comparison

ETF 1

MVFD

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF

This fund is part of

Multi-Asset: Other

-0.75%

Full MVFD fund page

VS

ETF 2

XOP

State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

This fund is part of

US Energy

+1.78%

Full XOP fund page

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) is part of the US Energy segment. MVFD's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Technology. In contrast, XOP's top sector exposures are Energy, Finance and Non-Energy Materials. MVFD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.1%, versus 0.35% for XOP. MVFD is up 19.98% year-to-date (YTD) with +$43M in YTD flows. XOP performs better with 63.38% YTD performance, and +$1.46B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MVFD and XOP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

MVFD vs XOP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/30/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	MVFD XOP	+11.84%+13.66%	+9.94%+16.98%	+19.98%+63.38%	+22.85%+65.12%	n/a+52.23%	n/a+109.46%
Flows	MVFD XOP	+$6M+$353M	+$11M+$465M	+$43M+$1.46B	+$46M+$1.37B	--$122M	--$2.03B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	MVFD XOP	+14.52%+26.78%	+14.45%+28.74%	n/a+28.46%	n/a+33.20%
Max drawdown	MVFD XOP	-6.10%-10.14%	-8.91%-18.50%	n/a-34.97%	n/a-34.97%
Max drawdown duration	MVFD XOP	29d27d	180d143d	n/a690d	n/a690d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	MVFD	XOP
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM	$33.47	$203.76
Previous close 10/29/2026	$33.34	$199.52
Consolidated volume 10/29/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of October 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	MVFD	XOP
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	MVFD	XOP
Last price	$33.47	$203.76
1D performance	+0.39%	+2.13%
AuM	$144.13 M	$4.62 B
E/R	1.1%	0.35%

Characteristics

	MVFD	XOP
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Monarch Fund	State Street Investment Management
Benchmark	Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index	S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index
N° of holdings	40	50
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	March 6, 2024	June 19, 2006
ESG	No	No

More MVFD data on Trackinsight

More XOP data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

MVFD

USA

99.78%

Other

0.22%

XOP

USA

97.08%

Other

2.92%

Sectors

MVFD

Energy

41.21%

Consumer Non-Cycl.

12.08%

Technology

10.22%

Non-Energy Materi.

7.81%

Industrials

7.21%

Other

21.47%

XOP

Energy

87.25%

Other

12.75%

Diversification

MVFD

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

44.56%

XOP

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

41.24%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of September 30, 2026

MVFD

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

3.92%

Occidental Petroleum Corp.

3.71%

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

3.59%

APA Corp.

3.16%

Kinetik Holdings, Inc.

2.93%

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

2.93%

SM Energy Co.

2.91%

Permian Resources Corp.

2.87%

NewMarket Corp.

2.83%

The J. M. Smucker Co.

2.68%

SLB Ltd.

2.67%

Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

2.63%

Matson, Inc.

2.61%

California Resources Corp.

2.59%

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

2.55%

XOP

PBF Energy, Inc.

2.89%

Valero Energy Corp.

2.87%

HF Sinclair Corp.

2.85%

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

2.85%

Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

2.82%

Phillips 66

2.81%

Murphy Oil Corp.

2.77%

Chevron Corp.

2.75%

Delek US Holdings, Inc.

2.73%

Devon Energy Corp.

2.70%

EOG Resources, Inc.

2.69%

APA Corp.

2.66%

ConocoPhillips

2.64%

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

2.61%

Crescent Energy Co.

2.60%

Frequently asked questions about MVFD and XOP

How have the MVFD and XOP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 30, 2026, MVFD is up 19.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XOP has returned 63.38%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVFD or XOP?

Year-to-date, the MVFD ETF saw +$43M in flows, compared to +$1.46B for XOP.

Which ETF is more volatile: MVFD or XOP?

Over the past year, MVFD had a volatility of 14.45%, while XOP experienced 28.74%.

Which ETF is bigger: MVFD or XOP?

As of October 30, 2026, MVFD holds $144.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while XOP manages $4.62 B.

What sectors do the MVFD and XOP ETFs invest in?

MVFD leans toward sectors like Energy, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Technology. Meanwhile, XOP focuses on Energy.

What are the top holdings of the MVFD ETF and XOP ETF?

MVFD top holdings include Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Occidental Petroleum Corp. and Marathon Petroleum Corp.. XOP holds in its top three: PBF Energy, Inc., Valero Energy Corp. and HF Sinclair Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: MVFD or XOP?

MVFD holds 40 securities with 44.56% of its assets in the top 15. XOP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.24%.

MoneyShow Chart of the Day 9/16/26: Oil? Surging. Oil Stocks? Not So Much.

September 16, 2026

XOP

ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)

January 27, 2026

XOP

MVFDvsXOPETF Comparison

Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF

State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF

MVFD vs XOP performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the MVFD and XOP ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 30, 2026, MVFD is up 19.98% year-to-date (YTD), while XOP has returned 63.38%. That puts XOP better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MVFD or XOP?

Year-to-date, the MVFD ETF saw +$43M in flows, compared to +$1.46B for XOP.

Which ETF is more volatile: MVFD or XOP?

Over the past year, MVFD had a volatility of 14.45%, while XOP experienced 28.74%.

Which ETF is bigger: MVFD or XOP?

As of October 30, 2026, MVFD holds $144.13 M in assets under management (AUM), while XOP manages $4.62 B.

What sectors do the MVFD and XOP ETFs invest in?

MVFD leans toward sectors like Energy, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Technology. Meanwhile, XOP focuses on Energy.

What are the top holdings of the MVFD ETF and XOP ETF?

MVFD top holdings include Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Occidental Petroleum Corp. and Marathon Petroleum Corp.. XOP holds in its top three: PBF Energy, Inc., Valero Energy Corp. and HF Sinclair Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: MVFD or XOP?

MVFD holds 40 securities with 44.56% of its assets in the top 15. XOP has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 41.24%.

MoneyShow Chart of the Day 9/16/26: Oil? Surging. Oil Stocks? Not So Much.

ETF Comparison: State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) Versus State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP)

The Trump Pump: ETF Winners from the 2024 Presidential Election

The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Benefit Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?

Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan

Oil Prices Slide Again Despite OPEC+’s Conditional Output Plan

Crude Oil ETFs Surge Despite Falling Oil Prices

War in the Middle East: ETF Movers & Shakers

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection