MOOvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.59% for PHO. MOO is up 19.2% year-to-date (YTD) with +$458M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -3.02% YTD performance, and -$105M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MOO vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO PHO | +6.27%-7.11% | +12.03%+3.63% | +19.20%-3.02% | +19.58%-3.49% | +15.25%+25.66% | +5.84%+19.34% |
| Flows | MOO PHO | +$111M-$30M | +$139M-$90M | +$458M-$105M | +$422M-$206M | +$89M-$333M | +$279M-$416M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO PHO | +13.42%+17.65% | +13.71%+15.97% | +14.67%+16.66% | +16.52%+18.45% |
| Max drawdown | MOO PHO | -3.05%-7.22% | -10.98%-13.83% | -22.31%-19.26% | -39.01%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO PHO | 23d32d | 193d324d | 852d250d | 1604d715d |
Trading data
MOO | PHO | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $86.48 | $68.49 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $86.79 | $68.07 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MOO | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MOO | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $86.48 | $68.49 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.62% |
| AuM | $1.16 B | $1.91 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.59% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MOO
USA
51.57%
Germany
9.81%
Norway
7.29%
Other
31.34%
PHO
USA
95.25%
Other
4.75%
Sectors
MOO
Consumer Non-Cycl.
34.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
29.09%
Industrials
20.65%
Healthcare
16.24%
PHO
Industrials
45.27%
Healthcare
17.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.54%
Technology
14.66%
Utilities
7.47%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
MOO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
72.49%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.01%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
MOO
Corteva, Inc.
8.92%
Bayer AG
8.89%
Deere & Co.
7.95%
Nutrien Ltd.
6.57%
Zoetis, Inc.
5.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
5.07%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.81%
Kubota Corp.
4.77%
Tyson Foods, Inc.
4.37%
Bunge Global SA
3.14%
Mowi ASA
3.01%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
2.58%
Wilmar International Ltd.
2.57%
Yara International ASA
2.39%
CNH Industrial NV
2.24%
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.37%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.29%
Waters Corp.
6.69%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.57%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.51%
Veralto Corp.
4.49%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.19%
Xylem, Inc.
4.17%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
3.87%
IDEX Corp.
3.61%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.33%
Pentair plc
3.17%
AECOM
3.01%
Trimble, Inc.
2.94%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.80%
Frequently asked questions about MOO and PHO
How have the MOO and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, MOO is up 19.2% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -3.02%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or PHO?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$458M in flows, compared to -$105M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or PHO?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 13.71%, while PHO experienced 15.97%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or PHO?
As of September 10, 2026, MOO holds $1.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $1.91 B.
What sectors do the MOO and PHO ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Non-Cyclicals, Non-Energy Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and PHO ETF?
MOO top holdings include Corteva, Inc., Bayer AG and Deere & Co.. PHO holds in its top three: Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or PHO?
MOO holds 46 securities with 72.49% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.01%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MOO & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
December 18, 2023
MOO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
