Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
MOOvsPHOETF Comparison
VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MOO's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities. MOO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.59% for PHO. MOO is up 13.48% year-to-date (YTD) with +$299M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with -2.43% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MOO and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
MOO vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MOO PHO | -1.58%-7.08% | +16.76%-3.69% | +13.48%-2.43% | +22.26%+3.63% | +2.88%+36.45% | +8.21%+45.42% |
| Flows | MOO PHO | +$44M-$31K | +$295M-$14M | +$299M-$13M | +$263M-$201M | -$224M-$256M | +$91M-$4M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MOO PHO | +13.91%+15.55% | +15.72%+18.58% | +14.96%+16.22% | +16.36%+18.14% |
| Max drawdown | MOO PHO | -4.90%-7.87% | -12.71%-12.71% | -26.51%-19.26% | -39.01%-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | MOO PHO | 18d47d | 43d58d | 1015d250d | 1419d715d |
MOO | PHO | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $83.78 | $68.46 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $82.46 | $68.65 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
MOO | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
MOO | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $83.78 | $68.46 |
| 1D performance | +1.60% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $957.37 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.59% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the MOO and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 9, 2026, MOO is up 13.48% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has lost -2.43%. That puts MOO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MOO or PHO?
Year-to-date, the MOO ETF saw +$299M in flows, compared to -$13M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MOO or PHO?
Over the past year, MOO had a volatility of 15.72%, while PHO experienced 18.58%.
Which ETF is bigger: MOO or PHO?
As of March 9, 2026, MOO holds $957.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.03 B.
What sectors do the MOO and PHO ETFs invest in?
MOO leans toward sectors like Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the MOO ETF and PHO ETF?
MOO top holdings include DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC. PHO holds in its top three: ECOLAB, US31488V1070 and WATERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: MOO or PHO?
MOO holds 47 securities with 70.5% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.33%.
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
Agricultural Commodity Futures ETFs vs Agricultural Equities ETFs
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
