MGNRvsPHOETF Comparison
VS
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF (MGNR) and Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. MGNR's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, PHO's top sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials. MGNR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.59% for PHO. MGNR is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$925M in YTD flows. PHO performs worse with 3.41% YTD performance, and -$126M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of MGNR and PHO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
MGNR vs PHO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | MGNR PHO | -3.01%+5.60% | +1.45%+1.43% | +10.74%+3.41% | +20.12%-0.14% | n/a+46.88% | n/a+29.07% |
| Flows | MGNR PHO | +$27M-$4M | +$463M-$51M | +$925M-$126M | +$979M-$155M | --$327M | --$426M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | MGNR PHO | +21.53%+13.99% | +23.86%+15.70% | n/a+16.47% | n/a+18.39% |
| Max drawdown | MGNR PHO | -16.16%-7.48% | -16.59%-13.81% | n/a-19.26% | n/a-28.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | MGNR PHO | 64d80d | 148d279d | n/a250d | n/a715d |
Trading data
MGNR | PHO | |
Last sale 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.94 | $73.93 |
| Previous close 10/28/2026 | $48.58 | $72.44 |
| Consolidated volume 10/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
MGNR
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexMGNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
MGNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.94 | $73.93 |
| 1D performance | -1.32% | +2.06% |
| AuM | $1.25 B | $2.02 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.59% |
Characteristics
MGNR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Beacon | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index |
| N° of holdings | 44 | 40 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 6, 2024 | December 6, 2005 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
MGNR
USA
48.17%
Canada
28.99%
Other
22.84%
PHO
USA
95.58%
Other
4.42%
Sectors
MGNR
Non-Energy Materi.
59.73%
Energy
25.15%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.82%
Other
7.3%
PHO
Industrials
44.74%
Healthcare
17.72%
Non-Energy Materi.
15.33%
Technology
14.97%
Utilities
7.24%
Other
0%
Advertisement
Diversification
MGNR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
56.85%
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.12%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
MGNR
ArcelorMittal SA
4.49%
Venture Global, Inc.
4.23%
Teck Resources Limited
4.14%
Hudbay Minerals, Inc.
4.07%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
4.03%
Smurfit WestRock Plc
4.03%
Range Resources Corp.
3.86%
Kinross Gold Corp.
3.82%
Equinox Gold Corp.
3.68%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.57%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
3.52%
Antero Resources Corp.
3.51%
Vista Energy SAB de CV
3.47%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
3.32%
Bunge Global SA
3.10%
PHO
Roper Technologies, Inc.
9.56%
Ecolab, Inc.
8.22%
Waters Corp.
7.31%
Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.
6.67%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
6.13%
Veralto Corp.
4.40%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
4.28%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.08%
Xylem, Inc.
3.79%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
3.64%
IDEX Corp.
3.62%
Trimble, Inc.
3.06%
Pentair plc
2.91%
Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
2.77%
AECOM
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about MGNR and PHO
How have the MGNR and PHO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 28, 2026, MGNR is up 10.74% year-to-date (YTD), while PHO has returned 3.41%. That puts MGNR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: MGNR or PHO?
Year-to-date, the MGNR ETF saw +$925M in flows, compared to -$126M for PHO.
Which ETF is more volatile: MGNR or PHO?
Over the past year, MGNR had a volatility of 23.86%, while PHO experienced 15.7%.
Which ETF is bigger: MGNR or PHO?
As of October 28, 2026, MGNR holds $1.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while PHO manages $2.02 B.
What sectors do the MGNR and PHO ETFs invest in?
MGNR leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Energy and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PHO focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the MGNR ETF and PHO ETF?
MGNR top holdings include ArcelorMittal SA, Venture Global, Inc. and Teck Resources Limited. PHO holds in its top three: Roper Technologies, Inc., Ecolab, Inc. and Waters Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: MGNR or PHO?
MGNR holds 44 securities with 56.85% of its assets in the top 15. PHO has 40 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.12%.
Advertisement
Latest news about MGNR & PHO
Could Water ETFs Be the Next AI Bottleneck Trade?
September 10, 2026
PHO
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
