LQDWvsQQQIETF Comparison
ETF 1
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
This fund is part of
Options Strategies
-0.88%
VS
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (LQDW) and NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. LQDW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.34%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. LQDW is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD) with +$99M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$7.55B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LQDW and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LQDW vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LQDW QQQI | +0.58%+0.65% | -0.83%+1.01% | +0.35%+10.72% | +1.01%+14.06% | +13.84%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | LQDW QQQI | +$38M+$447M | +$96M+$2.14B | +$99M+$7.55B | +$102M+$9.46B | +$258M- | -- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LQDW QQQI | +5.06%+16.13% | +4.24%+16.85% | +4.35%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | LQDW QQQI | -2.53%-6.64% | -3.48%-9.62% | -3.49%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | LQDW QQQI | 50d13d | 109d76d | 181dn/a | n/an/a |
Trading data
LQDW | QQQI | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $22.69 | $53.62 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $22.70 | $54.90 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
QQQI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexLQDW | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LQDW | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $22.69 | $53.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | -2.33% |
| AuM | $350.66 M | $14.89 B |
| E/R | 0.34% | 0.68% |
Characteristics
LQDW | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Cboe LQD BuyWrite Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Fixed Income | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 18, 2022 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LQDW
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
LQDW
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
LQDW
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
LQDW
Data will be available soon
QQQI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about LQDW and QQQI
How have the LQDW and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDW is up 0.35% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has returned 10.72%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LQDW or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the LQDW ETF saw +$99M in flows, compared to +$7.55B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: LQDW or QQQI?
Over the past year, LQDW had a volatility of 4.24%, while QQQI experienced 16.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: LQDW or QQQI?
As of October 16, 2026, LQDW holds $350.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $14.89 B.
Latest news about LQDW & QQQI
ETF Comparison: NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) Versus Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
September 3, 2026
QQQI
How Covered Call ETFs Evolved Through the Years
August 12, 2026
QQQI
Advertisement
