LOCTvsJEPIETF Comparison
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer (October) ETF
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer (October) ETF (LOCT) and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPI) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. LOCT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for JEPI. LOCT is up 4.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. JEPI performs better with 6.49% YTD performance, and +$4.32B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LOCT and JEPI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
LOCT vs JEPI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LOCT JEPI | +0.43%+1.91% | +1.15%+3.73% | +4.05%+6.49% | +5.38%+8.65% | +19.26%+38.12% | n/a+43.51% |
| Flows | LOCT JEPI | +$597K-$201M | +$597K+$188M | -$2M+$4.32B | -$2M+$4.79B | +$7M+$14.50B | -+$41.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LOCT JEPI | +0.67%+6.29% | +1.93%+8.08% | +3.18%+10.07% | n/a+11.15% |
| Max drawdown | LOCT JEPI | -0.20%-3.20% | -1.26%-6.70% | -4.38%-13.24% | n/a-13.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | LOCT JEPI | 8d56d | 41d156d | 44d180d | n/a420d |
LOCT | JEPI | |
Last sale 10/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $23.89 | $57.36 |
| Previous close 10/19/2026 | $23.87 | $57.06 |
| Consolidated volume 10/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
LOCT | JEPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $23.89 | $57.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.09% | +0.53% |
| AuM | $11.35 M | $45.99 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
LOCT | JEPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 2, 2023 | May 20, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
