LITPvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LITP's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Utilities and Non-Corporate. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. LITP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.75% for URNM. LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD) with +$5M in YTD flows. URNM performs better with -20.87% YTD performance, and +$461M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LITP and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LITP vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LITP URNM | -24.30%-13.85% | -31.68%-14.75% | -36.94%-20.87% | -22.97%-32.34% | -35.00%+12.57% | n/a+13.26% |
| Flows | LITP URNM | -+$44M | -+$158M | +$5M+$461M | +$9M+$414M | +$28M+$504M | -+$1.05B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LITP URNM | +37.16%+39.37% | +45.37%+44.03% | +41.82%+37.32% | n/a+39.31% |
| Max drawdown | LITP URNM | -37.88%-30.05% | -57.12%-48.24% | -63.32%-50.18% | n/a-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | LITP URNM | 52d50d | 161d260d | 794d485d | n/a485d |
Trading data
LITP | URNM | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $7.47 | $43.05 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $7.51 | $43.22 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LITP | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LITP | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $7.47 | $43.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.51% | -0.39% |
| AuM | $27.58 M | $1.70 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
LITP | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Sprott ETFs | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 1, 2023 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LITP
Australia
41.9%
Canada
13.9%
China
12.75%
Chile
12.14%
USA
10.56%
Other
8.75%
URNM
Canada
56.48%
Australia
16.81%
USA
13.69%
Other
13.02%
Sectors
LITP
Non-Energy Materi.
96.34%
Other
3.66%
URNM
Energy
77.17%
Non-Corporate
13.63%
Industrials
7.96%
Other
1.24%
Advertisement
Diversification
LITP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.28%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
92.29%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
LITP
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
12.14%
PLS Group Ltd.
10.96%
Albemarle Corp.
10.09%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
8.39%
Liontown Ltd.
6.64%
IGO Ltd.
5.79%
Tianqi Lithium Corp.
4.37%
Lithium Argentina AG
4.19%
Elevra Lithium Ltd.
4.09%
Lithium Americas Corp.
3.81%
Sigma Lithium Corp.
3.47%
Core Lithium Ltd.
3.43%
Vulcan Energy Resources Ltd.
3.39%
PMET Resources, Inc.
2.89%
Standard Lithium Ltd.
2.64%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
18.91%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
13.63%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
12.42%
Denison Mines Corp.
5.22%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.95%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.91%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.84%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.55%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.50%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.01%
Yellow Cake Plc
3.95%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
3.22%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.76%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.30%
Boss Energy Ltd.
2.13%
Frequently asked questions about LITP and URNM
How have the LITP and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP is down -36.94% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -20.87%. That puts URNM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LITP or URNM?
Year-to-date, the LITP ETF saw +$5M in flows, compared to +$461M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LITP or URNM?
Over the past year, LITP had a volatility of 45.37%, while URNM experienced 44.03%.
Which ETF is bigger: LITP or URNM?
As of October 15, 2026, LITP holds $27.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.70 B.
What sectors do the LITP and URNM ETFs invest in?
LITP leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LITP ETF and URNM ETF?
LITP top holdings include Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, PLS Group Ltd. and Albemarle Corp.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LITP or URNM?
LITP holds 39 securities with 86.28% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 92.29%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LITP & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
The Worst Performing ETFs of 2024
January 8, 2025
LITP
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
LITP
URNM
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: June 2024
June 20, 2024
LITP
Advertisement
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
