LITvsURNMETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, URNM's top sector exposures are Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials. Both LIT and URNM have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%. LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. URNM performs worse with -7.26% YTD performance, and +$313M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and URNM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs URNM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT URNM | -13.70%-8.46% | -17.91%-26.95% | +5.29%-7.26% | +53.70%+6.00% | +8.01%+68.09% | -11.66%+109.83% |
| Flows | LIT URNM | -$66M+$14M | -$110M+$14M | -$60M+$313M | -$59M+$150M | -$1.37B+$523M | -$1.12B+$1.18B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT URNM | +29.75%+43.13% | +28.50%+42.86% | +26.41%+36.52% | +26.28%+40.97% |
| Max drawdown | LIT URNM | -25.43%-31.18% | -25.43%-41.76% | -49.84%-50.18% | -64.51%-50.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT URNM | 74d91d | 74d176d | 875d485d | 1705d485d |
Trading data
LIT | URNM | |
Last sale 7/27/2026 at 7:20 PM | $68.49 | $49.88 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $67.81 | $49.43 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/27/2026 at 7:20 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.49 | $49.88 |
| 1D performance | +1.00% | +0.91% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $1.85 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.75% |
Characteristics
LIT | URNM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Lithium Index | North Shore Global Uranium Mining Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 26 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 22, 2010 | November 29, 2019 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
URNM
Canada
53.28%
USA
14.34%
Australia
14.3%
Other
18.08%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
URNM
Energy
70.79%
Non-Corporate
13.23%
Industrials
7.82%
Other
8.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
URNM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
86.04%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
URNM
Cameco Corp.
17.17%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
13.23%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
11.35%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.85%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.85%
Deep Yellow Ltd.
4.38%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.26%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.16%
CGN Mining Co. Ltd.
4.04%
Yellow Cake Plc
3.78%
Ur-Energy, Inc.
2.88%
Bannerman Energy Ltd.
2.39%
IsoEnergy Ltd.
2.22%
Boss Energy Ltd.
1.60%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and URNM
How have the LIT and URNM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD), while URNM has lost -7.26%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or URNM?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$313M for URNM.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or URNM?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.5%, while URNM experienced 42.86%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or URNM?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while URNM manages $1.85 B.
What sectors do the LIT and URNM ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, URNM focuses on Energy, Non-Corporate and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and URNM ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. URNM holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or URNM?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. URNM has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 86.04%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & URNM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
URNM
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
URNM
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Sprott Asset Management’s Steve Schoffstall
February 9, 2024
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSE Arca: URNM)
February 8, 2024
URNM
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URNM
Advertisement
