LITvsTANETF Comparison
VS
Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) and Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. LIT's top 3 sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, TAN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. LIT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.7% for TAN. LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD) with -$60M in YTD flows. TAN performs worse with 4.55% YTD performance, and +$489M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of LIT and TAN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
LIT vs TAN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | LIT TAN | -13.70%-11.99% | -17.91%-11.63% | +5.29%+4.55% | +53.70%+31.14% | +8.01%-26.95% | -11.66%-37.18% |
| Flows | LIT TAN | -$66M-$44M | -$110M+$109M | -$60M+$489M | -$59M+$624M | -$1.37B+$214M | -$1.12B-$362M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | LIT TAN | +29.75%+41.87% | +28.50%+35.11% | +26.41%+35.95% | +26.28%+36.16% |
| Max drawdown | LIT TAN | -25.43%-30.39% | -25.43%-30.39% | -49.84%-62.85% | -64.51%-73.61% |
| Max drawdown duration | LIT TAN | 74d54d | 74d54d | 875d1037d | 1705d1726d |
Trading data
LIT | TAN | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.81 | $51.28 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $69.02 | $52.85 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
LIT | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
LIT | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.81 | $51.28 |
| 1D performance | -1.75% | -2.97% |
| AuM | $1.49 B | $1.48 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.7% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
TAN
USA
47.18%
Israel
21.86%
Other
30.96%
Sectors
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
TAN
Industrials
44.59%
Utilities
34.02%
Technology
11.87%
Other
9.53%
Advertisement
Diversification
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
TAN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
TAN
First Solar, Inc.
9.79%
Nextpower, Inc.
9.61%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
7.16%
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd.
6.62%
Sunrun, Inc.
5.00%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
4.71%
Doral Group Renewable Energy Resources Ltd.
4.44%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
3.87%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
3.56%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
3.55%
Solaria Energía y Medio Ambiente SA
3.46%
GCL Technology Holdings Ltd.
3.30%
T1 Energy, Inc.
3.23%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
2.76%
Energix-Renewable Energies Ltd.
2.53%
Frequently asked questions about LIT and TAN
How have the LIT and TAN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT is up 5.29% year-to-date (YTD), while TAN has returned 4.55%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: LIT or TAN?
Year-to-date, the LIT ETF saw -$60M in flows, compared to +$489M for TAN.
Which ETF is more volatile: LIT or TAN?
Over the past year, LIT had a volatility of 28.5%, while TAN experienced 35.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: LIT or TAN?
As of July 24, 2026, LIT holds $1.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while TAN manages $1.48 B.
What sectors do the LIT and TAN ETFs invest in?
LIT leans toward sectors like Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, TAN focuses on Industrials, Utilities and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the LIT ETF and TAN ETF?
LIT top holdings include Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp.. TAN holds in its top three: First Solar, Inc., Nextpower, Inc. and Enphase Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: LIT or TAN?
LIT holds 36 securities with 78.8% of its assets in the top 15. TAN has 35 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.59%.
Advertisement
Latest news about LIT & TAN
The Trump Trade: Which ETFs Stand to Lose Most from a Second Donald Trump Presidency?
August 14, 2024
TAN
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
TAN
Advertisement
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Inflation Reduction Act: 3 renewable energy ETFs to watch
September 20, 2022
LIT
Investing in solar energy with ETFs
June 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
